Nalod
Posts: 68632
Alba Posts: 154
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508 USA
|
knicks1248 wrote:Nalod wrote:knicks1248 wrote:martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:knickstorrents wrote:Agree, I saw their press conference and liked how they pushed the idea of patience. They spoke about the mistakes of the past, and how quick fixes were tried several times which always ended up badly for the Knicks. They talked about building a sustainable winning culture. They were also pushing defense heavily. We'll see from the type of players they acquire and draft. Stay away from the DSjr and Malik Monk types (one dimensional scorers), and get the Frank Ntilikina (high iq, defensive mindset) types. You really only need 1 dynamic scorer anyway, you surround this player with high iq 3 and d type players that can switch on every possession and defend and shoot the 3 and you'll be a decent team.I do think they are too high on Tim Hardaway Jr. It was an overpay, he does not have a defensive mindset, and he's not especially efficient. I'm not sure what they see in him, but I hope he improves over time. I didn't care or the THJ signing, but i understood it, and his defense has a lot to do with how he is being taught, which in ATL he look much more engaged. Perry and Mills preach defense, than trade or acquired some of the worst defenders in the league at their respected positions JACK, MUDIAY, MCDERMOTT, KANTER,BURKE. You've just painted about 1/3 of a picture and what happened with the Knicks while WILLFULLY ignoring the rest. Case in point: You can understand why the Knicks signing THJr but don't understand McDermott/Kanter? Hello Melo trade, did you just forget the circumstance about that? Mudiay/Burke are short term guys with the upside of being long term if they pan out. Jack is an OBVIOUS even shorter term guy who was on a non-guaranteed contract. Look to Frank if you want to know about their feel for defense; and not only the drafting of such a player, but their handling of him within the long term. knicks1248 wrote:This silly Idea that recent regimes(walsh, grunwald, phil) have tried quick fixes is as lame as it gets. Walsh took a yr and half to trade away a slew of bad contracts to get cap space to sign two superstars (which everyone know you need that to win) thats not a quick fixGrunwald had no cap space, and sign some vets to 2 yr contracts to complement Amare and Melo, he signed JR, Novak, Lin, Camby, KIDD, Tyson, KT, Rasheed (very solid vets to reasonable contracts) no quick fix here Phil did what walsh did and clear the deck to get some quality vets to go around KP and Melo, but unlike grunwald (who gave 2 yr contracts) phil gave 4 yrs and couldn't get a single star to sign with the 30+ million in cap space that he had. What is Perry and MILLS plan, if they think that they are going to just let Noah, lance and Lee's contract expire and be bad for 2 more yrs, they will get FIRED. You cant preach (but so much) patience when your taking over a team that's been really bad for 4 yrs, you cant say hey... Give me another 3 or 4 yrs of being bad before for we see some success. And you absolutely can preach patience, this is a new FO with a new direction (even if Mills is a retread). It's YOU that need to adjust your thinking. FRANK is a Triangle/Phil draft pick, please don't convince yourself otherwise The knicks had chump change left after signing THJ,incomes jack We have establish two things this entire season, JH SUCKED and Frank is a project, 2 things we essentially knew before the season even started. The culture remain the same I don't care what anyone says, you play to win games, and the roster put together either didn't care or down right sucked from a talent standpoint. Which should concerned every knick fan about future moves if the past moves look suspect. So when CRUSH posted this thread wondering why media outlets still think this is a dysfunctional FRANCHISE, look no further than the constant change that doesn't resulted in an ounce of progress or success. I literally have no idea what you are trying to communicate. What the hell is a Triangle PG? I don't even know what that means
IS KP a Triangle C/PF? A triangle PG is a ball handler thats a spot up shooter, who defers to his teammates, penetrates and slides to the perimeter and waits to be the 4th option, and there's nothing wrong with that if you have the likes of the Players NOLAD mention.
In other words, FRANK is a great prospect, if you have the KOBEs, the shaqs, the pippens, the Jordans, leaders, guys that will hoist up 20 to 25 shots per game, ball dominate players. FRANKS not a great pick, when you have no none of the above, and the rest of the roster is just as reluctant to shoot or take over, or play and real defense. I'm really trying to figure out how long we should we be patient with the current FO after our 4 yrs of 50 losses. You equate MIlls to Phil as one and the same? You don't see any change when Phil left? Mills let JH hang himself Phil jumped in and said no, your going do it this way. I liked most of phils doings except the triangle, and i mean i hated the triangle so much it negated the things i did like about phil. I really don't have much choice but to Give the FO their opportunity, but DOLAND is doing to mills, what MILLS did to JH. phil taking the entire blame for his 3 yrs of losing means that MILLS had zero input(which you know is BULL SHT), they sat together at every single game like Mills is now doing with perry. It was never mills signed noah or lee, mills traded for rose, or mill traded JR, that was all phil now it's all about PeRRY this and perry that... Lets do this one more time. Most Team presidents oversea the whole operation, including talent. most GM's are roster centric. PHil had the title of President but in My opinion he did the roster and Mills was more the president for all other operations. So lets say it was a hybrid. Now it Perry as the roster dude, Mills in the more traditional role. Presidents have final say over contracts and sign off on money things. Players are money things. Did Mills trade Willy? Or did Perry? Did Mills get Mudiay? or Perry? Did Mills sign off on Melo? Of course. For big money, even DOlan might have had some final say as he did pay the man a lot of damn money. Its my opinion the blame game is not so clear. Yes, Mills HIRED perry, so its on him. In my mind, and a lot others Mills gets a reboot. Phil impressed they go triangle. As for JH, he was a good hire. Phil was awful to insist on his system. JH gets a free pass on year one. Year he got fired. Can't ask more than that. Give the guy a chance. Now this FO gets to hire its guy. Please answer this: Would you have knicks fire Mills today?
|