Vmart wrote:Jmpasq wrote:Nalod wrote:Vmart wrote:reub wrote:Dotson did it last night within the offensive schemes too. He never forced any shots and was unselfish. Also 11 rebounds and good defense.Thanks, Phil!
The Knicks way is so damn mind boggling. They have Dotson right under their nose and they look elsewhere for answers instead of giving him a shot.
He did have a bad incident of questionable consent in a sexual encounter. He had to transfer. From all accounts he owned up to a mistake and is a good kid. "Rapist"? Read up on the incident, its not an unfair label.
As for the usual "lets blame Knicks for keeping him down" as if he was always ready to score 30pts in a game is typical. Kid is a good player and we should praise the process that got him to that game last night. Where it goes from here is undetermined.
"Arrived"? Might be a strong label. Happy we are having these moments thru a miserable season. Not everyone will stick.
Baker has to thank his lucky stars he got his money cuz he got some work to do!
Baker was always awful, I still have no idea what the Knicks were thinking. He is one of the worst contracts in the NBA. He has no business making that much. Dotson is far more skilled than Baker, its not even close.
This is what happens when developing players aren’t given sufficient playing time. The Knicks are notorious for over paying what they don’t know or have enough data to make a sound judgment. This is what I have saying all along this is a development year why are the vets playing so much. Dotson, ntlikina, Kornet, Hernangomez and Burke should have been called up way sooner because he was lighting it up in G league should have been racking up minutes right off the bat. For me this was a developmental disaster of a year. The Knicks didn’t create any certainty of players they can go forward with and they didn’t secure a draft lottery position that will yield a possible great player.
This is exactly right. Dotson is exactly the kind of player the knicks should be developing. Dotson is probably the best perimeter defender besides Frank and maybe Ron Baker. But unlike Baker he has significant offensive potential.
The Knicks keep talking about improving the perimeter defense (Knicks are one of the worst teams in the NBA at defending the perimeter). Well news flash the perimeter defense will not improve unless the Knicks play good perimeter defenders which Dotson is.
Posters keep saying winning is a culture Well Dotson with his 2 way potential could be part of that winning culture. Add another potential elite defender say Mikal Bridges and suddenly you have the makings of a winning defensive culture(Dotson, Bridges, Frank KP) but of course Jeff and the Knicks would rather play Mudiay who does not play a lick of defense SMH. Finally (only because of injuries not smarts Dotson) gets playing time and lights it up.
People say it is a small sample size-one game. Well whose fault is that. This is the entire point Dotson should have been playing so there would be a large enough sample size to see if he could be part of the winning culture. Now we know no more than we did before because Jeff refused to play him.