[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The hypocrisy of the Tank....
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Jmpasq
Posts: 25242
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182
2/13/2018  7:56 PM
HofstraBBall wrote:Btw. Jazz showing some signs of a rebuild.

They drafted the right player we didn't, if we took Mitchell we would of been .500 at the very least

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
AUTOADVERT
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/13/2018  11:34 PM
Jmpasq wrote:
HofstraBBall wrote:Btw. Jazz showing some signs of a rebuild.

They drafted the right player we didn't, if we took Mitchell we would of been .500 at the very least

Which means we drafted the right player. Who wants to be around .500 in NBA. Only perennial losers.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Jmpasq
Posts: 25242
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182
2/14/2018  6:45 AM
arkrud wrote:
Jmpasq wrote:
HofstraBBall wrote:Btw. Jazz showing some signs of a rebuild.

They drafted the right player we didn't, if we took Mitchell we would of been .500 at the very least

Which means we drafted the right player. Who wants to be around .500 in NBA. Only perennial losers.


I'm confused so your strategy is to pick the least talented players in the draft? The purpose of losing is to build a roster of great young players, not **** young players. Obviously if we pick the right guys in the draft we will probably have years around .500 first like the 76ers. I very much doubt this roster will go from 30 to 60 wins in 1 year
Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
Jmpasq
Posts: 25242
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182
2/14/2018  6:52 AM
I don't get why ping pong balls are given out based on position in the standings, shouldn't be based on wins? Look at this year there are 9 teams within 2 wins of each other why should a team with 1 or 2 wins more get such better odds at the top pick. Shouldn't they work out some mathematical formula that incorporates winning percentage differences. For instance Chicago has 20 wins and has a 2% chance at the top pick and the Suns with 18 have a 20% chance, has does that follow.
Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
Nalod
Posts: 68625
Alba Posts: 154
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/14/2018  7:14 AM
Every year there are players drafted that should have went earlier, or are bettter rookies.
55 games does not make a career. Not for teenagers.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/14/2018  9:41 AM
Jmpasq wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Jmpasq wrote:
HofstraBBall wrote:Btw. Jazz showing some signs of a rebuild.

They drafted the right player we didn't, if we took Mitchell we would of been .500 at the very least

Which means we drafted the right player. Who wants to be around .500 in NBA. Only perennial losers.


I'm confused so your strategy is to pick the least talented players in the draft? The purpose of losing is to build a roster of great young players, not **** young players. Obviously if we pick the right guys in the draft we will probably have years around .500 first like the 76ers. I very much doubt this roster will go from 30 to 60 wins in 1 year

Of course it will not.
In 5 years may be.
Team building is long process.
Especially if you starting from demolishing and ground 0.
My point is this was correct pick at this point of rebuild.
Considering time window, upside, and skill set.
Scoring point guards are always available in bunches.
Defensive specialists not so much.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
2/15/2018  12:10 PM
We traded the TeamCancer for vets! Quality vets! Overachieving vets! Hooray!
Oh ****, they actually don't play D here, EITHER! McFuckets can't shoot! What the hell?

KOQ is the way! Rim protection! Other GM's are salivating! We're going to get assets for KOQ!
Oh wow, KOQ is back to being... inconsistent, hey, when did that ever happen before?

We signed Timmy! Take that Phil, you barefooted selfie taking Dolanrich bastid! He's going to overperform for that PG-type contract! Look, what a great investment he is!
Timmy's hurt! Timmy suhhhhucks! Timmy's not Robin to KP's Batman, because KP's not Batman! He's more like the Green Hornet! And now KP's going to possibly pull a BK on us!

I just want to know, where are all these "assets" that are going to play once we just buy out all these vets, or give them away while stockpiling second rounders?
Frankie?
Burke?
Dotson?
Kornet?

Probably be more fun to watch old DLee and Gallinari and KryptoNate highlights...

Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
The hypocrisy of the Tank....
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy