VDesai wrote:I want to see how Dougie Mac keeps playing. If his defense continues to be solid, he brings a lot to the table. His off ball cuts to the basket have been a pleasant surprise on top of his knockdown shooting. And from his college days I know he has a bit of back to the basket game as well. With the length we have at other parts of the roster I think you can get away with playing him at the 3 cause he isn't a defensive liability.Then I think you draft an athlete to play behind him - not saying you're finding an Ariza again, but there are more Ariza types sitting there late in the draft that need time to develop and NBA jumper, but can run and jump and play defense.
Agreed. I think if you're the Knicks, you go out of your way now to find out more about Doug. Well said -- he's definitely NOT the liability on D like everyone thought--dude gives solid effort defensively, and then on the offensive end, he's a real knockdown shooter that just knows what he's doing. Brings a lot to the table.
Eventually, I'd really like to see Doug starting and getting more minutes and shots up at the basket.
Look at Otto Porter: In 33.4 mins. on 11.6 shots a game, he's almost 55% from the field, 47% from 3, averaging 15.8 ppg -- those are very good numbers. Porter's also averaging almost 7.5 rpg and 1.8 steals per. He's been impressive and has really rounded out into a solid player for the Wizards.. Conversely, Doug's only getting 22 mins. per and 6.7 shots up. What could Doug do if they upped his PT by another 10 mins. and he got almost double the amount of shots up? Could we have something close to our own Otto Porter here? Maybe. If I'm Jeff, I'd go out of my way to find this out. I think more McDermott, with his high % offense/smarts/effort on defense, only helps the Knicks and could solve our long-term SF issue.
To me, Kanter and McDermott are keepers long-term. All about getting the most possible outta these two now.