Author | Thread |
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
7/27/2017 8:33 AM
Chandler wrote:martin wrote:CrushAlot wrote:The guy started a separate thread just for this rumor. why, these are journey players, Ish smith has been on 11 different teams in 10 seasons. The only thing this does is rid ourselves of melo. The only thing Ish can teach frank, is how to Pack light, and great Hotels to live in for a few months..smh ES
|
AUTOADVERT |
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
7/27/2017 8:44 AM
EnySpree wrote:fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:agree... especially with a pick coming back. Ish Smith would be a great fit. Most of the roster are pretty good shooters. A guy that can get us some dribble penetration would be big. That's Smith's MO... he had a very good season last yearmartin wrote:CrushAlot wrote:The guy started a separate thread just for this rumor. So what your saying is Ryan is better than Tobias..Your insane if you think that, This trade is not happing by any stretch, No one want's a stretch 4 who shoots 2 or 3 three's per game for no 20 mill a year. Every pf in the league is shooting 3's, there like a dime a dozen these days ES
|
Markji
Posts: 22753 Alba Posts: -4 Joined: 9/14/2007 Member: #1673 USA |
7/27/2017 9:10 AM LAST EDITED: 7/27/2017 9:19 AM
Knickoftime wrote:ttttHofstraBBall wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Rookie wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:I still don't see what interest Portland would have in the trade unless they are dumping Leonards contract? They do need a stretch 4 and Anderson fits the bill. They just traded away Crabbe in order to save money. Are they now willing to add that money back by taking on Anderson? Knicks don't have to take Leonard; Houston does, and the trade works via ESPN trade checker. Houston receives : Melo; Leonard; O. Jaramaz The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense.
Tom Clancy - author
|
fishmike
Posts: 53117 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
7/27/2017 9:12 AM
knicks1248 wrote:thats not what he said at all... he said he's looking for the right fit. Ryan Anderson is overpaid but a very good player and was 9th in the NBA in 3s made. He's also a fantastic floor spacer and that clearly shows in the metrics that the Rockets are much better with him on the floor.EnySpree wrote:fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:agree... especially with a pick coming back. Ish Smith would be a great fit. Most of the roster are pretty good shooters. A guy that can get us some dribble penetration would be big. That's Smith's MO... he had a very good season last yearmartin wrote:CrushAlot wrote:The guy started a separate thread just for this rumor. If you think guys like Ryan Anderson are a dime a dozen its you who are insane. Anderson may be overpaid but Morey also understood the value he brought and Morey was 100% correct, that value is easily seen in the stats. If you choose to look. Or you could just make something up and go with that. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
7/27/2017 9:12 AM LAST EDITED: 7/27/2017 9:13 AM
knicks1248 wrote:EnySpree wrote:fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:agree... especially with a pick coming back. Ish Smith would be a great fit. Most of the roster are pretty good shooters. A guy that can get us some dribble penetration would be big. That's Smith's MO... he had a very good season last yearmartin wrote:CrushAlot wrote:The guy started a separate thread just for this rumor. I don't care what other people want (or what internet posters think they want). This is a tough comparison. Do you want the specialist who's deadly at the one thing he does well or the versatile player who's fairly good at many things but great at none? They both have a positive impact on the court - Anderson more so but he's older and you can't guarantee his weaknesses won't be more of a problem here. If it's just a straight up comparison of Anderson and Harris with no picks or anything else involved, I'd take Harris but It's close. |
fishmike
Posts: 53117 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
7/27/2017 9:48 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:Harris is better but its about fit. Almost half of Harris offense comes from within 10 feet of the basket. Thats a poor fit next to Drummond who is a pure lane clogger and space taker. Now while Anderson is a less versatile player he's a much better fit next to Drummond. There is some fit/logic there.knicks1248 wrote:EnySpree wrote:fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:agree... especially with a pick coming back. Ish Smith would be a great fit. Most of the roster are pretty good shooters. A guy that can get us some dribble penetration would be big. That's Smith's MO... he had a very good season last yearmartin wrote:CrushAlot wrote:The guy started a separate thread just for this rumor. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
Chandler
Posts: 25988 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
7/27/2017 9:53 AM
Markji wrote:Knickoftime wrote:ttttHofstraBBall wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Rookie wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:I still don't see what interest Portland would have in the trade unless they are dumping Leonards contract? They do need a stretch 4 and Anderson fits the bill. They just traded away Crabbe in order to save money. Are they now willing to add that money back by taking on Anderson? interesting. Does the trade work if the Knicks get that pick? I ask because it seems weird that Portland gets to salary dump Leonard and they get a pick back I can see MDA and company being interested in this arrangement. With Melo they get a facsimile of Anderson (to some degree) in Leonard. And with Melo playing, Anderson would have received less shots and minutes -- which better suits Leonard (5)(5)
|
Chandler
Posts: 25988 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
7/27/2017 9:55 AM
fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Harris is better but its about fit. Almost half of Harris offense comes from within 10 feet of the basket. Thats a poor fit next to Drummond who is a pure lane clogger and space taker. Now while Anderson is a less versatile player he's a much better fit next to Drummond. There is some fit/logic there.knicks1248 wrote:EnySpree wrote:fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:agree... especially with a pick coming back. Ish Smith would be a great fit. Most of the roster are pretty good shooters. A guy that can get us some dribble penetration would be big. That's Smith's MO... he had a very good season last yearmartin wrote:CrushAlot wrote:The guy started a separate thread just for this rumor. Harris would be better fit for us too -- plays D, young, local kid, getting better I agree Anderson is a better fit for Detroit too (5)(5)
|
Markji
Posts: 22753 Alba Posts: -4 Joined: 9/14/2007 Member: #1673 USA |
7/27/2017 10:08 AM LAST EDITED: 7/27/2017 10:16 AM
Chandler wrote:Markji wrote:Knickoftime wrote:ttttHofstraBBall wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Rookie wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:I still don't see what interest Portland would have in the trade unless they are dumping Leonards contract? They do need a stretch 4 and Anderson fits the bill. They just traded away Crabbe in order to save money. Are they now willing to add that money back by taking on Anderson? Yes the trade works if we re-arrange the picks. But if the Knicks are getting Gordon from Houston as well as Harkless, I'm not sure Houston would give us that pick. And also Onuaku from Portland, then I think Portland will want something more to join in this trade as a faciliator. Those details of picks can be worked out; we can perhaps receive a 2nd round pick; its the players and matching salaries that are pretty tough to make meet the requirements of a trade. This will work and we get good assets in return for Melo. And I think it benefits all of the teams involved. The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense.
Tom Clancy - author
|
Chandler
Posts: 25988 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
7/27/2017 10:21 AM
Markji wrote:Chandler wrote:Markji wrote:Knickoftime wrote:ttttHofstraBBall wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Rookie wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:I still don't see what interest Portland would have in the trade unless they are dumping Leonards contract? They do need a stretch 4 and Anderson fits the bill. They just traded away Crabbe in order to save money. Are they now willing to add that money back by taking on Anderson? got it. thanks will be interesting to watch. I have to imagine Houston will have trouble letting Gordon go after losing Williams. Who would be their 6th man they covet? (5)(5)
|
martin
Posts: 68540 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
7/27/2017 10:25 AM
Markji wrote:Knickoftime wrote:ttttHofstraBBall wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Rookie wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:I still don't see what interest Portland would have in the trade unless they are dumping Leonards contract? They do need a stretch 4 and Anderson fits the bill. They just traded away Crabbe in order to save money. Are they now willing to add that money back by taking on Anderson? Interesting trade, especially if Knicks can move Gordon again later on, really no need for him on the current roster. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
Markji
Posts: 22753 Alba Posts: -4 Joined: 9/14/2007 Member: #1673 USA |
7/27/2017 10:40 AM LAST EDITED: 7/27/2017 10:51 AM
martin wrote:Markji wrote:Knickoftime wrote:ttttHofstraBBall wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Rookie wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:I still don't see what interest Portland would have in the trade unless they are dumping Leonards contract? They do need a stretch 4 and Anderson fits the bill. They just traded away Crabbe in order to save money. Are they now willing to add that money back by taking on Anderson? Yes, perhaps trade CLee for a veteren PG. maybe Brandon Knight if he is healthy? Then our team is more evenly balanced. There is a hold on trading players received in a multi-player trade. The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense.
Tom Clancy - author
|
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29859 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
7/27/2017 11:04 AM
Markji wrote:Chandler wrote:Markji wrote:Knickoftime wrote:ttttHofstraBBall wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Rookie wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:I still don't see what interest Portland would have in the trade unless they are dumping Leonards contract? They do need a stretch 4 and Anderson fits the bill. They just traded away Crabbe in order to save money. Are they now willing to add that money back by taking on Anderson? Leonard is dead weight to them imo. They were interested in Anderson because they could package Harkless and Leonard for him and dump Leonards contract. Knicks are still giving up Carmelo Anthony. Portland shouldn't receive a pick for trading away Harkless and Leonard while also receiving Kuz. Knicks should def get the pick. Good deal other then that. Knicks could look to forward Gordan to a contender for other assets. https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|