Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
7/13/2017 4:36 PM
Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
HofstraBBall
Posts: 27186 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
7/13/2017 4:39 PM
reub wrote: This may shed some light on the issue. https://www.google.com/amp/newyork.cbslocal.com/2017/07/13/trading-carmelo-anthony-difficult/amp/ 'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29859 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
7/13/2017 4:59 PM
CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Sounds about right. Portland would take Anerson and dump Harkless and Leonard. Need a team to take Leonard but the question is who gives up the pick to take Leonard on. He is only 25 and can shoot 3s and rebound decently. https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/13/2011 Member: #3370 |
7/13/2017 5:20 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: I doubt the issue is giving up a pick to take Leonard. It's probably more like expecting to receive a pick to take Leonard. |
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29859 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
7/13/2017 5:24 PM
Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: I'm saying what team is going give up the pick to the team that takes on Leonard. Portland will say they are taking on Anderson so they shouldn't have to give up a pick as well. Houston probably giving Knick a draft pick already and are giving one away in the Paul trade so I doubt they want to trade away another one. And the Knicks aren't going to trade their draft pick. https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/13/2011 Member: #3370 |
7/13/2017 5:33 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Yes, correct. It may boil down to how motivated the Knicks are to just move on from Melo and create the cap space just taking back Harkless would create. They may have give up the pick coming to them to go to that team. |
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29859 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
7/13/2017 5:38 PM LAST EDITED: 7/13/2017 5:39 PM
Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Mills probably doesn't feel he can sell that to the fans. That he just came away with Harkless and cap space. They are probably doing a lot of work seeing what FA they can nab with that space to cover that. We would free up 17mil? https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
7/13/2017 5:42 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Are you guys sure we could do that? We don't have to take back more? |
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/13/2011 Member: #3370 |
7/13/2017 5:43 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: More like 15 since Baker took them about $2m over, if I'm up to date. Minus x more if they sign Dotson beforehand. |
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/13/2011 Member: #3370 |
7/13/2017 5:46 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Yes, there is no limit on how much less you can take. If someone can absorb leonard, the math works, assuming Houston sends two of the four NGC's they have. |
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29859 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
7/13/2017 5:49 PM LAST EDITED: 7/13/2017 5:51 PM
Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: There isn't many 24 yr old Hardaway jr like options left. Rondo could get the nod on a 2 yr deal. They could (but they won't) use that space to eat a contract of a vet pg for a pick or 2. If Brandon Knight wasn't sooooo horrible I would take him with a pick. https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
7/13/2017 6:05 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Knickoftime wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: You sure about that? I think they said they wanted to rebuild with youth except that they wanted a veteran PG. Regardless I'm wondering if the deal is not nearly as close to being done as is being implied. |