Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/29/2003 Member: #411 USA |
5/23/2017 2:40 PM
who?
|
martin
Posts: 68676 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
5/23/2017 2:46 PM
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:who? exactly Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
Nalod
Posts: 68677 Alba Posts: 154 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
5/24/2017 7:14 AM
Knixkik wrote:Berman of the post cleared the air. Longstaff was fired long before this. Before KP skipped the meeting. Completely changes the narrative. Link: http://nypost.com/2017/05/23/the-real-reason-behind-firing-of-a-kristaps-porzingis-favorite/ Perhaps this was part of KP's little hissy fit at exit meeting time? Not Phil being vindictive as some of you would liked? |
Knixkik
Posts: 34905 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
5/24/2017 8:40 AM
Nalod wrote:Knixkik wrote:Berman of the post cleared the air. Longstaff was fired long before this. Before KP skipped the meeting. Completely changes the narrative. I actually think it may have factored into KP skipping the meeting. He clearly wouldn't agree with this. But it makes perfect sense that it happened long before it was reported. |
GustavBahler
Posts: 41138 Alba Posts: 15 Joined: 7/12/2010 Member: #3186 |
5/24/2017 9:48 AM
Knixkik wrote:Nalod wrote:Knixkik wrote:Berman of the post cleared the air. Longstaff was fired long before this. Before KP skipped the meeting. Completely changes the narrative. When did KP hear about Longstaff not being renewed? Sounds like Phil is trying to get his side of the story out with this article. This is good news because it looks like an attempt by Phil to bring the temperature down between the Knicks and Porzingis. Too many times we've seen the opposite approach, so this is a welcome development. |
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29863 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
5/24/2017 10:22 AM
GustavBahler wrote:Knixkik wrote:Nalod wrote:Knixkik wrote:Berman of the post cleared the air. Longstaff was fired long before this. Before KP skipped the meeting. Completely changes the narrative. If the reporting was done properly then there would be no need for Phil to turn down the temperature. He has to interrupt his attention and energy that should be used for scouting and working the phones building possible trade packages or scouting players already in the NBA to see fits that other team may want to dump. Phil didn't retain Longstaff which in Phil's eyes *will improve the Knicks* since Longstaff apparently didn't work well with the other coaches besides Bliss. But how does any of the false narratives and negative attention created by the media *help the Knicks*?? https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
GustavBahler
Posts: 41138 Alba Posts: 15 Joined: 7/12/2010 Member: #3186 |
5/24/2017 10:54 AM LAST EDITED: 5/24/2017 10:57 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Knixkik wrote:Nalod wrote:Knixkik wrote:Berman of the post cleared the air. Longstaff was fired long before this. Before KP skipped the meeting. Completely changes the narrative. Of course Phil had to turn down the temperature. Phil's passive aggressive tweets, unnecessary comments about players through the media. Hiring Rambis (apparently the highest paid assistant in the league), in spite of being one of the worst coaches in NBA history. His only talent seems to be pissing off players. No other team president as far as I can tell has made things more unnecessarily complicated. From the mandated system, to antagonizing players. Chalking all this up to being the media's fault is creating a very false narrative. As I said, Phil trying to cool things down is a good thing. Hope its a change in direction. |
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29863 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
5/24/2017 12:16 PM
GustavBahler wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Knixkik wrote:Nalod wrote:Knixkik wrote:Berman of the post cleared the air. Longstaff was fired long before this. Before KP skipped the meeting. Completely changes the narrative. Media's job is to report the news and uncover truth. Not make **** up. In this case Berman is the only one who seems to have done did his job. Longstaff was not renewed but it was reported that he was fired. The decision to not renew Longstaff was decided before KPs exit meeting. Not to be vindictive toward KP for missing out on the exit meeting. KPs actions of missing the exit meeting created this narrative not Phil's tweeting history. The reasoning for Longstaff not being renewed was said to be because he didn't work well with other coaches on staff. Doing actual reporting work by Berman seems to have uncovered the reasoning rather then spewing out a agenda driven narrative. So Phil did not act dysfunctional but Longstaff may have caused some type of dysfunction within the coaching staff and this move might clean up some of that up. Everything you named Phil has done at the end of the day is what he believes will help make the Knicks better. Based off his track record of dealing with personalities to championships there might be something to that. Rambis may or may not suck as a head coach since he never really had talented teams to work with. But I doubt that you can give an honest assessment of his abilities as an assistant to claim what he should or shouldn't be getting paid. . https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|