EnySpree wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Knixkik wrote:You can see the passing and playmaking ability if you really watch him. He doesn't have d rose tunnel vision. His playmaking will never be on display alongside Fox, but he can be converted like Harden was. You can build an offense completely around monk, Porzingis, and Hernangomez. You will have to have wings who are unselfish, versatile on defense, and can shoot. Lee and Thomas can provide some of that, but obviously longterm upgrades would be needed. I can definitely see phil going this route. Worst case, monk becomes just a scorer who can provide secondary playmaking, but best case is he can use his elite skills and athletic ability and turn into a triangle type pg.
In the triangle, the pg brings the ball up, hands it of, and runs to the corner. There's very little play making (see jennings) and scoring is a 3rd or 4th option..When you think pg's, you better think on the lines of FISHER and KERR
But when did you ever see Rose or Jennings hand off and run to the corner? 🤔🤥🤥🤥🤥
jennings said it himself, he wasn't able to be creative becacuase that's not the triangle, and rose also said he could not understand the offense
[quoteIn a system that essentially requires the point guard to be stationed in the corner, a non-shooter like Rose is often tasked with playing to his weaknesses.
Rose is averaging 17.6 points and 4.4 assists per game, which implies that he’s ill-equipped to be New York’s facilitator. He’s also a 22.8 percent 3-point shooter, which implies that he’s ill-equipped to work without the ball.
If the Knicks are going to make a successful push for the postseason, then Rose will need to adapt and adjust
]
Once again, I would like people to go look at all the PG's in phils triangle, not 1 avg over 5 assist