Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Knixkik
Posts: 34905 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
2/15/2017 1:07 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Knixkik wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Knixkik wrote:1 interesting fact about De'Aaron Fox is he is a better free throw shooter than both Ball and Fultz and he gets to the free throw line a ton. Fox is known as a non-shooter, while Ball and Fultz both shoot well from the outside, but free throw shooting is a huge indicator of future improvements in overall shooting, which bodes well for Fox. Fox is highest on my list of realistic targets (outside projected top 5) because his speed, playmaking, and defense are 3 elite skills that we know will translate to the NBA right away. I would rather than a prospect who is elite in some areas and has a couple weaknesses, than someone who is solid in all areas, because sometimes those players who are good in many areas but great in none tend to not translate as well to the NBA. Yeah, Rubio is probably his floor, which is still a very good player. Rubio is a poor finisher though, and Fox is a very good finisher. I also think Fox's shot looks more fixable. Rubio has a flat, slow release that doesn't give him much hope. Not the case with Fox, but it will be a concern with him for sure. |
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
2/15/2017 2:46 PM
Knixkik wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Knixkik wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Knixkik wrote:1 interesting fact about De'Aaron Fox is he is a better free throw shooter than both Ball and Fultz and he gets to the free throw line a ton. Fox is known as a non-shooter, while Ball and Fultz both shoot well from the outside, but free throw shooting is a huge indicator of future improvements in overall shooting, which bodes well for Fox. Fox is highest on my list of realistic targets (outside projected top 5) because his speed, playmaking, and defense are 3 elite skills that we know will translate to the NBA right away. I would rather than a prospect who is elite in some areas and has a couple weaknesses, than someone who is solid in all areas, because sometimes those players who are good in many areas but great in none tend to not translate as well to the NBA. The NBA becomes a tough place when you are scared to shoot it. RIP Crushalot😞
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38386 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
2/15/2017 3:10 PM
How good are the Pg prospects compared to say Kris Dunn?
|
Knixkik
Posts: 34905 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
2/15/2017 4:51 PM
smackeddog wrote:How good are the Pg prospects compared to say Kris Dunn? All 5 of them are considered much better prospects. Dunn is already 23 years old. He might not crack the lottery in this draft. |
smackeddog
Posts: 38386 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
2/15/2017 5:08 PM
Knixkik wrote:smackeddog wrote:How good are the Pg prospects compared to say Kris Dunn? Thanks! |
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
2/16/2017 2:11 AM LAST EDITED: 2/16/2017 2:13 AM
BRIGGS wrote:My lottery as of now
http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Josh-Jackson---Point-Forward-5740/ Have to say, I've seen Lonzo Ball a few times now and other than the range on his shot, I haven't been impressed by him. I feel he's a little overrated. If we stay in 6-10 range, I think Fox should be the target. But I'd love to get up to the top 5 ranger and have a crack at Josh Jackson or Markelle Fultz - those are the two can't miss stars of this draft IMHO. I like Fox and Monk a lot though.
¿ △ ?
|