Knickoftime wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:The path of drafting good players
Well, I'd argue NO team ever intentionally follows the path of drafting bad players, but more relevant to the Knicks, how has that path changed?
They didn't have a draft pick this year. They'd maintained all picks in their possession. I don't see any alternation of this particular path.
and acquiring young players with high upside and or solid vets at extremely reasonable bargains.
Who qualified for that last year? Honest question?
Lopez was neither particularly young, had high upside or was an extremely reasonable bargain.
MAYBE Williams qualifies, but you aren't building a successful team of KP and Williamses.
And not for nothing, but he hasn't even officially left yet.
I am just saying it looks like we changed direction.
And I neither see the clearly marked path you do nor see the derivation from it.
I think Lopez was a very reasonable contract
Yes Williams is high upside low salary player we picked up
Yes, I think you can build a team like that - just not in one or two years - I think you gather assets over time and at some point you need a bit of luck, but if we have the right pieces we can score a real big player on a trade that doesn't have health issues and attitude problems.
The clear direction was that we were staying away from starfukks for players with a bunch of baggage or question marks - we haven't changed that yet, but the premise of another thread is a 4 year deal for Noah at 18MM - That would be the change from that direction
Also letting go of a valuable trade asset for one year rental is NOT a good move and IS a change in direction as well
I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates