[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Derrick Rose Article Noting His Improvement
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/26/2016  3:44 PM
I found a very insightful article on how Rose showed improvement this year. It's got so many charts and videos that you really should read the original article.

http://www.chicagonow.com/chicago-bulls-confidential/2016/02/derrick-rose-attack-mode/

Here is a snippet from the article.

Not only is he attempting more-or-less, the same amount of shots close to the basket, he's attempting more shots in the mid-range area (11-14 ft) in January than his season average. Per NBA.com SportVU data, Rose averages 9.3 drives per game, but over the month of January, that number has dipped slightly to 9.0. His average speed on offense over the course of the season is 4.62 miles per hour, but only 4.51 mph in January. Rose isn't attacking with more aggression or speed or explosiveness. He's just started making his shots.

Bringing his restricted area shooting percentage up from 48.9 to 59.5 during the month, Rose has regained his scoring ability because of his ability to convert closer to the basket. That comes from a bit more shiftiness and explosiveness in the air, not because he has amped up the attempts.

What Rose is doing differently is attacking the defense earlier in the shot clock. According to the below chart (based on SportVU shooting data) Rose is taking a higher frequency of shots early in the shot clock, where he has a better chance of scoring.

Based on his scoring percentages, Rose field goal percentage drops as the clock goes down, so getting more shots up earlier, helps his efficiency. Sure, he's finishing at higher rates overall, but he's giving himself better looks by taking early offense to heart.

Closer to the start of the season, Coach Hoiberg was challenging Rose to get the ball across half court with at least 21 seconds on the shot clock. At first, he might get across half court with 21 seconds on the shot clock, but would then dribble a few times and wait to set up a half-court set. That was not the point. The point was to initiate offense and attack the defense before they had a chance to set up. Eventually, it clicked. He's done a better job attacking full-court, in transition -- not just getting across half-court by the 21-second mark, but getting all the way to the basket by 18 or so.

AUTOADVERT
EwingsGlass
Posts: 26087
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/26/2016  4:59 PM
I'm fond of his back story and quote clips. I think this will work out for us.
This is the Randle.
EwingsGlass
Posts: 26087
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/26/2016  5:14 PM
A better point is shot clock timing. I like believing (without real analysis) that Melo is a good late clock scorer. Higher than other players late in the clock, by his ability to create his own shot. Derrick is good early clock. We anayze shot charts to see who is good at what part the court, but we can start to parse the clock the same way. Combining SSOL with the motion and balancing of Triangle and bumping up the spacing out the 3pt line should be amazing.

Rose can be in the paint before the moment of truth occurs...18 secs into the shot clock. See, this is where having KP6 lag can be a killer. A big has to come out really opening up wing passes. If they leave anyone less than 7 feet on him, he can just shoot over them. Melo must be smiling and whoever fills that other wing slot will have their best season yet. IF, its a big if, Rose is healthy.

This is the Randle.
NardDogNation
Posts: 27307
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/26/2016  5:22 PM
Yeah, let's ignore that this article was written on February 3rd....and that the season ended in April. Because what he did for a month and a half was far more important than the season in its entirety.
EwingsGlass
Posts: 26087
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/26/2016  5:42 PM
NardDogNation wrote:Yeah, let's ignore that this article was written on February 3rd....and that the season ended in April. Because what he did for a month and a half was far more important than the season in its entirety.

Let's not ignore it. Give me your analysis of his performance after January. Or you can just cast sardonic slings like your posts like this which carry zero meaning.

The article clearly mentions his terrible performance for the first 2 months.

Weight the information however you wish. Discount it to zero because it ignores the last three months of the season. But to give just a blanket statement that it is worthless is actually worse.

I saw how old it was and weighted the information. The question for me is whether he had any setbacks after that date. I don't know.

For me, the meaning is a statement of his athleticism. System play, odd team chemistry and other things can cause a lot of issues. Things that were assists with Noah may have been TOs with anyone else. But, if he had his athleticism back, I am betting on him.

Does he have his step back or not?

This is the Randle.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/26/2016  5:54 PM
NardDogNation wrote:Yeah, let's ignore that this article was written on February 3rd....and that the season ended in April. Because what he did for a month and a half was far more important than the season in its entirety.

WOW! Talk about not having a F'n Clue! Dude do you realize that Rose came into the season off a surgery and then had a broken orbital bone that impacted his vision? So from my perspective what is most important is that he actually got better and showed that he could in fact play at a higher level. IMO that wasn't even the best he can be as this offseason he's not dealing with rehab from a surgery, so he's able to really work on his conditioning and his skills.

He actually did play better and more efficiently as the year progressed. If you look at the season he did start to improve starting in January.


DATE Games MIN FGM-FGA FG% 3PM-3PA 3P% FTM-FTA FT% REB AST BLK STL PF TO PTS
November 10 32.7 5.4-15.3 .353 0.6-2.6 .231 1.9-2.4 .792 3.9 6.3 0.5 0.6 1.3 2.3 13.3
December 14 32.9 6.4-15.4 .414 0.7-2.5 .286 1.9-2.8 .667 3.3 4.4 0.2 0.6 1.6 2.7 15.3
January 13 30.4 7.4-15.7 .471 0.5-1.8 .292 2.3-2.4 .968 3.2 3.3 0.2 0.5 1.5 2.5 17.6
February 8 33.1 8.5-19.4 .439 0.8-2.4 .316 4.1-4.9 .846 5.6 6.0 0.1 0.9 1.6 3.3 21.9
March 15 30.0 7.1-15.3 .461 1.0-2.5 .405 1.5-2.1 .710 2.6 4.5 0.1 0.7 0.7 2.5 16.6

April 3 34.3 5.7-15.0 .378 0.0-1.7 .000 1.7-2.0 .833 3.3 4.7 0.0 1.0 0.3 3.0 13.0
VCoug
Posts: 24935
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2007
Member: #1406

6/26/2016  6:01 PM
If only there was someway to look at what Rose's FG% was at the rim for the rest of the year after January:

February: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=5 50% within 5ft of the basekt; 52% in the restricted area

March: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=6 48% within 5ft of the basekt; 46% in the restricted area

April: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=7 30% within 5ft; 25% in the restricted area

Now the joy of my world is in Zion How beautiful if nothing more Than to wait at Zion's door I've never been in love like this before Now let me pray to keep you from The perils that will surely come
NardDogNation
Posts: 27307
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/26/2016  6:05 PM
EwingsGlass wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:Yeah, let's ignore that this article was written on February 3rd....and that the season ended in April. Because what he did for a month and a half was far more important than the season in its entirety.

Let's not ignore it. Give me your analysis of his performance after January. Or you can just cast sardonic slings like your posts like this which carry zero meaning.

The article clearly mentions his terrible performance for the first 2 months.

Weight the information however you wish. Discount it to zero because it ignores the last three months of the season. But to give just a blanket statement that it is worthless is actually worse.

I saw how old it was and weighted the information. The question for me is whether he had any setbacks after that date. I don't know.

For me, the meaning is a statement of his athleticism. System play, odd team chemistry and other things can cause a lot of issues. Things that were assists with Noah may have been TOs with anyone else. But, if he had his athleticism back, I am betting on him.

Does he have his step back or not?

During the draft they had a graphic that showed Rose's average of points-in-the-paint per month during the season. The thing looked exactly like a bell-curve with the peak being around January-February and completely bottomed out by the end of the season. I tried finding a clip of it on Youtube or a snapshot of it on Google Images but was not successful. In any case, I think it's kind of disingenious to post a thread praising Derrick's "improvement" without acknowledging that the evidence being used was only 2 months into the season and that he seemed to flatline as a penetrator (his bread and butter) as the season went along from that point.

In any case, I'm not going to bother commenting on how awful a trade this was. I kind of feel that I stated my peace and hope that I'm wrong. So feel free to continue feeding into the hype; this might be the only feel-good period we'll have during Rose's tenure in New York. Shalom.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27307
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/26/2016  6:16 PM
VCoug wrote:If only there was someway to look at what Rose's FG% was at the rim for the rest of the year after January:

February: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=5 50% within 5ft of the basekt; 52% in the restricted area

March: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=6 48% within 5ft of the basekt; 46% in the restricted area

April: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=7 30% within 5ft; 25% in the restricted area

Serious question, is that encouraging? Not trying to be a smart ass but I'm just curious. Maybe I'm being a little jaded but this improvement (from God awful) seemed to only occur over 28-36 games. I don't find this to be terribly encouraging when you consider the market at PG, what we gave up and where we want this team to be.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/26/2016  6:17 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
EwingsGlass wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:Yeah, let's ignore that this article was written on February 3rd....and that the season ended in April. Because what he did for a month and a half was far more important than the season in its entirety.

Let's not ignore it. Give me your analysis of his performance after January. Or you can just cast sardonic slings like your posts like this which carry zero meaning.

The article clearly mentions his terrible performance for the first 2 months.

Weight the information however you wish. Discount it to zero because it ignores the last three months of the season. But to give just a blanket statement that it is worthless is actually worse.

I saw how old it was and weighted the information. The question for me is whether he had any setbacks after that date. I don't know.

For me, the meaning is a statement of his athleticism. System play, odd team chemistry and other things can cause a lot of issues. Things that were assists with Noah may have been TOs with anyone else. But, if he had his athleticism back, I am betting on him.

Does he have his step back or not?

During the draft they had a graphic that showed Rose's average of points-in-the-paint per month during the season. The thing looked exactly like a bell-curve with the peak being around January-February and completely bottomed out by the end of the season. I tried finding a clip of it on Youtube or a snapshot of it on Google Images but was not successful. In any case, I think it's kind of disingenious to post a thread praising Derrick's "improvement" without acknowledging that the evidence being used was only 2 months into the season and that he seemed to flatline as a penetrator (his bread and butter) as the season went along from that point.

In any case, I'm not going to bother commenting on how awful a trade this was. I kind of feel that I stated my peace and hope that I'm wrong. So feel free to continue feeding into the hype; this might be the only feel-good period we'll have during Rose's tenure in New York. Shalom.


Man you've gotta do better than this. You're pissin on the guy without doing any in depth research. I hate that ISH. If you want to be taken seriously on this then you have to at least present something that has a legit foundation. He did show a large enough body of work that indicated he can in fact play at a better level than his overall season stats might indicate.

The thing is nothing is guaranteed but this summer Rose is not coming off of a surgery and an Orbital Fracture!!! So he's got a full summer to work on his conditioning and hopefully he comes into the season much stronger than last year. That's not hard to understand if you use simple logic.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27307
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/26/2016  6:20 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/26/2016  6:33 PM
nixluva wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:Yeah, let's ignore that this article was written on February 3rd....and that the season ended in April. Because what he did for a month and a half was far more important than the season in its entirety.

WOW! Talk about not having a F'n Clue! Dude do you realize that Rose came into the season off a surgery and then had a broken orbital bone that impacted his vision? So from my perspective what is most important is that he actually got better and showed that he could in fact play at a higher level. IMO that wasn't even the best he can be as this offseason he's not dealing with rehab from a surgery, so he's able to really work on his conditioning and his skills.

He actually did play better and more efficiently as the year progressed. If you look at the season he did start to improve starting in January.


DATE Games MIN FGM-FGA FG% 3PM-3PA 3P% FTM-FTA FT% REB AST BLK STL PF TO PTS
November 10 32.7 5.4-15.3 .353 0.6-2.6 .231 1.9-2.4 .792 3.9 6.3 0.5 0.6 1.3 2.3 13.3
December 14 32.9 6.4-15.4 .414 0.7-2.5 .286 1.9-2.8 .667 3.3 4.4 0.2 0.6 1.6 2.7 15.3
January 13 30.4 7.4-15.7 .471 0.5-1.8 .292 2.3-2.4 .968 3.2 3.3 0.2 0.5 1.5 2.5 17.6
February 8 33.1 8.5-19.4 .439 0.8-2.4 .316 4.1-4.9 .846 5.6 6.0 0.1 0.9 1.6 3.3 21.9
March 15 30.0 7.1-15.3 .461 1.0-2.5 .405 1.5-2.1 .710 2.6 4.5 0.1 0.7 0.7 2.5 16.6

April 3 34.3 5.7-15.0 .378 0.0-1.7 .000 1.7-2.0 .833 3.3 4.7 0.0 1.0 0.3 3.0 13.0

"Dude", are you aware that there seems to always be some **** wrong with Rose that inevitably results in him having to restart the rehab process all over again? The man is only 28 years old and has missed 39% of his games since 2013; what leads you to believe that history will not repeat itself? After all, it's highly unlikely that his body will hold up more as a older man more than it did during his youth.

And if Rose doesn't regain his form, I wonder what his real value is? Because he doesn't have particularly high bball IQ and does not have any discernible skills that can make him an elite role player (now that his athletic ability has been diminished). The man that has you so optimistic hovers around 3 turnovers per game, is shooting below 32% from 3 (with exception to a 15 game period in March) and is only averaging 2-3 free throws a game per your own graphic. That's the man you want running your offense in any capacity? Because he went from God-awful to "meeeh"?

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/26/2016  6:23 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:If only there was someway to look at what Rose's FG% was at the rim for the rest of the year after January:

February: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=5 50% within 5ft of the basekt; 52% in the restricted area

March: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=6 48% within 5ft of the basekt; 46% in the restricted area

April: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=7 30% within 5ft; 25% in the restricted area

Serious question, is that encouraging? Not trying to be a smart ass but I'm just curious. Maybe I'm being a little jaded but this improvement (from God awful) seemed to only occur over 28-36 games. I don't find this to be terribly encouraging when you consider the market at PG, what we gave up and where we want this team to be.


What Market at PG??? Pretty much the "market" is Conley. A lot of the other PG's are OK but not what you'd call high upside guys.

We gave up RoLo! As good as he was he is replaceable. We needed a PG more than we needed RoLo.

Rose fits where this team wants to go as long as he's healthy. Right now he's healthy and hopefully he remains so.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27307
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/26/2016  6:36 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/26/2016  6:36 PM
nixluva wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:If only there was someway to look at what Rose's FG% was at the rim for the rest of the year after January:

February: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=5 50% within 5ft of the basekt; 52% in the restricted area

March: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=6 48% within 5ft of the basekt; 46% in the restricted area

April: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=7 30% within 5ft; 25% in the restricted area

Serious question, is that encouraging? Not trying to be a smart ass but I'm just curious. Maybe I'm being a little jaded but this improvement (from God awful) seemed to only occur over 28-36 games. I don't find this to be terribly encouraging when you consider the market at PG, what we gave up and where we want this team to be.


What Market at PG??? Pretty much the "market" is Conley. A lot of the other PG's are OK but not what you'd call high upside guys.

We gave up RoLo! As good as he was he is replaceable. We needed a PG more than we needed RoLo.

Rose fits where this team wants to go as long as he's healthy. Right now he's healthy and hopefully he remains so.


You win bro. But lets check back in at the end of the season to see if any of this holds true.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/26/2016  6:44 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
nixluva wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:If only there was someway to look at what Rose's FG% was at the rim for the rest of the year after January:

February: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=5 50% within 5ft of the basekt; 52% in the restricted area

March: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=6 48% within 5ft of the basekt; 46% in the restricted area

April: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=7 30% within 5ft; 25% in the restricted area

Serious question, is that encouraging? Not trying to be a smart ass but I'm just curious. Maybe I'm being a little jaded but this improvement (from God awful) seemed to only occur over 28-36 games. I don't find this to be terribly encouraging when you consider the market at PG, what we gave up and where we want this team to be.


What Market at PG??? Pretty much the "market" is Conley. A lot of the other PG's are OK but not what you'd call high upside guys.

We gave up RoLo! As good as he was he is replaceable. We needed a PG more than we needed RoLo.

Rose fits where this team wants to go as long as he's healthy. Right now he's healthy and hopefully he remains so.


You win bro. But lets check back in at the end of the season to see if any of this holds true.


I would expect that ALL Knick fans are rooting for Rose to have a great season!!! So yeah we can check back at the end of the season. Hopefully it's a long playoff run.

I can understand having doubts but for me you don't lose your skill due to simply to having ACL or Meniscus surgery. You lose it due to not having proper time to prepare and work on your conditioning, skills and timing. Rose is trying to get his skills back to an acceptable level. If he's not having knee pain and can play then he's gonna be able to work on and refine his skills. That's what he's doing this summer. So IMO it's not about talent as much as it is building up his conditioning and working on his skills.

VCoug
Posts: 24935
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2007
Member: #1406

6/26/2016  7:01 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:If only there was someway to look at what Rose's FG% was at the rim for the rest of the year after January:

February: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=5 50% within 5ft of the basekt; 52% in the restricted area

March: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=6 48% within 5ft of the basekt; 46% in the restricted area

April: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=7 30% within 5ft; 25% in the restricted area

Serious question, is that encouraging? Not trying to be a smart ass but I'm just curious. Maybe I'm being a little jaded but this improvement (from God awful) seemed to only occur over 28-36 games. I don't find this to be terribly encouraging when you consider the market at PG, what we gave up and where we want this team to be.

Fuck no, it's terrible. I'll have to try and find it again but I believe a league average player shoots 60%+ when shooting at the rim. Rose has been awful for 4 years now and nothing he did last year suggests he's getting better.

Now the joy of my world is in Zion How beautiful if nothing more Than to wait at Zion's door I've never been in love like this before Now let me pray to keep you from The perils that will surely come
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/26/2016  8:03 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/26/2016  8:06 PM
VCoug wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:If only there was someway to look at what Rose's FG% was at the rim for the rest of the year after January:

February: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=5 50% within 5ft of the basekt; 52% in the restricted area

March: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=6 48% within 5ft of the basekt; 46% in the restricted area

April: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=7 30% within 5ft; 25% in the restricted area

Serious question, is that encouraging? Not trying to be a smart ass but I'm just curious. Maybe I'm being a little jaded but this improvement (from God awful) seemed to only occur over 28-36 games. I don't find this to be terribly encouraging when you consider the market at PG, what we gave up and where we want this team to be.

Fuck no, it's terrible. I'll have to try and find it again but I believe a league average player shoots 60%+ when shooting at the rim. Rose has been awful for 4 years now and nothing he did last year suggests he's getting better.


I really want to help everyone get the clearest idea of what Rose was doing offensively and the NBA.com Stats are EXTREMELY detailed. So here we have the 3 months where Rose showed improvement and just so we're clear i'm suggesting that he can be better than this after a full summer of work and no surgery. He has to improve no doubt but he was not as bad as many are trying to make it out to be. Only when you add in the rough 2 months at the start does it really skew the numbers badly. Note that the Jump Shots include 3's so it looks worse than it is. Just check his 3pt % separately. He's not a great shooter but he was better from 3 in March.


Derrick Rose January
Shot Type Detail FGM FGA FG%

Cutting Layup Shot 3 4 75.0
Driving Bank shot 1 1 100
Driving Finger Roll Layup Shot 4 4 100
Driving Floating Jump Shot 3 5 60.0
Driving Hook Shot 1 1 100
Driving Layup Shot 28 40 70.0
Driving Reverse Layup Shot 2 3 66.7

Fadeaway Bank shot 2 2 100
Floating Jump shot 7 11 63.6
Jump Bank Shot 4 8 50.0
Jump Shot 13 63 20.6
Layup Shot 5 16 31.3

Pullup Bank shot 2 4 50.0
Pullup Jump shot 6 14 42.9

Running Finger Roll Layup Shot 0 1 0.0

Running Jump Shot 3 7 42.9
Running Layup Shot 3 7 42.9

Running Pull-Up Jump Shot 1 1 100
Step Back Bank Jump Shot 1 1 100
Step Back Jump shot 3 6 50.0
Turnaround Fadeaway shot 1 1 100
Turnaround Hook Shot 1 1 100
Turnaround Jump Shot 2 3 66.7

Derrick Rose February
Shot Type Detail FGM FGA FG%

Driving Bank shot 1 1 100
Driving Finger Roll Layup Shot 2 3 66.7
Driving Floating Jump Shot 1 1 100
Driving Layup Shot 11 19 57.9
Driving Reverse Layup Shot 1 1 100

Floating Jump shot 9 18 50.0
Fadeaway Bank shot 0 1 0.0
Fadeaway Jump Shot 0 2 0.0

Jump Bank Shot 6 11 54.5
Jump Shot 21 61 34.4
Layup Shot 3 13 23.1

Pullup Bank shot 1 2 50.0
Pullup Jump shot 1 5 20.0

Reverse Layup Shot 1 1 100
Running Jump Shot 1 2 50.0
Running Layup Shot 3 3 100
Running Pull-Up Jump Shot 1 1 100
Step Back Bank Jump Shot 1 2 50.0
Step Back Jump shot 1 2 50.0
Tip Layup Shot 1 1 100
Turnaround Jump Shot 2 2 100

Derrick Rose March
Shot Type Detail FGM FGA FG%

Driving Bank shot 2 2 100
Driving Finger Roll Layup Shot 4 6 66.7
Driving Floating Bank Jump Shot 1 2 50.0
Driving Floating Jump Shot 5 10 50.0
Driving Hook Shot 1 1 100
Driving Layup Shot 20 41 48.8
Driving Reverse Layup Shot 5 8 62.5
Dunk Shot 1 1 100
Fadeaway Bank shot 1 1 100
Fadeaway Jump Shot 3 3 100
Floating Jump shot 7 10 70.0

Jump Bank Shot 1 2 50.0
Jump Shot 30 86 34.9
Layup Shot 1 13 7.7
Pullup Bank shot 1 3 33.3

Pullup Jump shot 10 19 52.6

Reverse Layup Shot 2 3 66.7
Running Jump Shot 2 4 50.0
Running Layup Shot 4 4 100
Running Reverse Layup Shot 0 1 0.0
Step Back Jump shot 5 7 71.4

VCoug
Posts: 24935
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2007
Member: #1406

6/26/2016  8:19 PM
nixluva wrote:
VCoug wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:If only there was someway to look at what Rose's FG% was at the rim for the rest of the year after January:

February: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=5 50% within 5ft of the basekt; 52% in the restricted area

March: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=6 48% within 5ft of the basekt; 46% in the restricted area

April: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=7 30% within 5ft; 25% in the restricted area

Serious question, is that encouraging? Not trying to be a smart ass but I'm just curious. Maybe I'm being a little jaded but this improvement (from God awful) seemed to only occur over 28-36 games. I don't find this to be terribly encouraging when you consider the market at PG, what we gave up and where we want this team to be.

Fuck no, it's terrible. I'll have to try and find it again but I believe a league average player shoots 60%+ when shooting at the rim. Rose has been awful for 4 years now and nothing he did last year suggests he's getting better.


I really want to help everyone get the clearest idea of what Rose was doing offensively and the NBA.com Stats are EXTREMELY detailed. So here we have the 3 months where Rose showed improvement and just so we're clear i'm suggesting that he can be better than this after a full summer of work and no surgery. He has to improve no doubt but he was not as bad as many are trying to make it out to be. Only when you add in the rough 2 months at the start does it really skew the numbers badly. Note that the Jump Shots include 3's so it looks worse than it is. Just check his 3pt % separately. He's not a great shooter but he was better from 3 in March.


Derrick Rose January
Shot Type Detail FGM FGA FG%

Cutting Layup Shot 3 4 75.0
Driving Bank shot 1 1 100
Driving Finger Roll Layup Shot 4 4 100
Driving Floating Jump Shot 3 5 60.0
Driving Hook Shot 1 1 100
Driving Layup Shot 28 40 70.0
Driving Reverse Layup Shot 2 3 66.7

Fadeaway Bank shot 2 2 100
Floating Jump shot 7 11 63.6
Jump Bank Shot 4 8 50.0
Jump Shot 13 63 20.6
Layup Shot 5 16 31.3

Pullup Bank shot 2 4 50.0
Pullup Jump shot 6 14 42.9

Running Finger Roll Layup Shot 0 1 0.0

Running Jump Shot 3 7 42.9
Running Layup Shot 3 7 42.9

Running Pull-Up Jump Shot 1 1 100
Step Back Bank Jump Shot 1 1 100
Step Back Jump shot 3 6 50.0
Turnaround Fadeaway shot 1 1 100
Turnaround Hook Shot 1 1 100
Turnaround Jump Shot 2 3 66.7

Derrick Rose February
Shot Type Detail FGM FGA FG%

Driving Bank shot 1 1 100
Driving Finger Roll Layup Shot 2 3 66.7
Driving Floating Jump Shot 1 1 100
Driving Layup Shot 11 19 57.9
Driving Reverse Layup Shot 1 1 100

Floating Jump shot 9 18 50.0
Fadeaway Bank shot 0 1 0.0
Fadeaway Jump Shot 0 2 0.0

Jump Bank Shot 6 11 54.5
Jump Shot 21 61 34.4
Layup Shot 3 13 23.1

Pullup Bank shot 1 2 50.0
Pullup Jump shot 1 5 20.0

Reverse Layup Shot 1 1 100
Running Jump Shot 1 2 50.0
Running Layup Shot 3 3 100
Running Pull-Up Jump Shot 1 1 100
Step Back Bank Jump Shot 1 2 50.0
Step Back Jump shot 1 2 50.0
Tip Layup Shot 1 1 100
Turnaround Jump Shot 2 2 100

Derrick Rose March
Shot Type Detail FGM FGA FG%

Driving Bank shot 2 2 100
Driving Finger Roll Layup Shot 4 6 66.7
Driving Floating Bank Jump Shot 1 2 50.0
Driving Floating Jump Shot 5 10 50.0
Driving Hook Shot 1 1 100
Driving Layup Shot 20 41 48.8
Driving Reverse Layup Shot 5 8 62.5
Dunk Shot 1 1 100
Fadeaway Bank shot 1 1 100
Fadeaway Jump Shot 3 3 100
Floating Jump shot 7 10 70.0

Jump Bank Shot 1 2 50.0
Jump Shot 30 86 34.9
Layup Shot 1 13 7.7
Pullup Bank shot 1 3 33.3

Pullup Jump shot 10 19 52.6

Reverse Layup Shot 2 3 66.7
Running Jump Shot 2 4 50.0
Running Layup Shot 4 4 100
Running Reverse Layup Shot 0 1 0.0
Step Back Jump shot 5 7 71.4

He shot under 50% at the rim in February and March. Average is 60%, elite is 70%. Under 50% is awful.

Here, http://stats.nba.com/league/player/#!/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&DistanceRange=By%20Zone&sort=Restricted%20Area%20FG%20PCT&dir=1&PlayerPosition=G&SeasonSegment=Post%20All-Star, post-AllStar break he's ranked 167th amongs guards it FG% in the restricted area in that timeframe.

Now the joy of my world is in Zion How beautiful if nothing more Than to wait at Zion's door I've never been in love like this before Now let me pray to keep you from The perils that will surely come
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/26/2016  9:35 PM
VCoug wrote:
nixluva wrote:
VCoug wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:If only there was someway to look at what Rose's FG% was at the rim for the rest of the year after January:

February: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=5 50% within 5ft of the basekt; 52% in the restricted area

March: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=6 48% within 5ft of the basekt; 46% in the restricted area

April: http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/stats/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Month=7 30% within 5ft; 25% in the restricted area

Serious question, is that encouraging? Not trying to be a smart ass but I'm just curious. Maybe I'm being a little jaded but this improvement (from God awful) seemed to only occur over 28-36 games. I don't find this to be terribly encouraging when you consider the market at PG, what we gave up and where we want this team to be.

Fuck no, it's terrible. I'll have to try and find it again but I believe a league average player shoots 60%+ when shooting at the rim. Rose has been awful for 4 years now and nothing he did last year suggests he's getting better.


I really want to help everyone get the clearest idea of what Rose was doing offensively and the NBA.com Stats are EXTREMELY detailed. So here we have the 3 months where Rose showed improvement and just so we're clear i'm suggesting that he can be better than this after a full summer of work and no surgery. He has to improve no doubt but he was not as bad as many are trying to make it out to be. Only when you add in the rough 2 months at the start does it really skew the numbers badly. Note that the Jump Shots include 3's so it looks worse than it is. Just check his 3pt % separately. He's not a great shooter but he was better from 3 in March.


Derrick Rose January
Shot Type Detail FGM FGA FG%

Cutting Layup Shot 3 4 75.0
Driving Bank shot 1 1 100
Driving Finger Roll Layup Shot 4 4 100
Driving Floating Jump Shot 3 5 60.0
Driving Hook Shot 1 1 100
Driving Layup Shot 28 40 70.0
Driving Reverse Layup Shot 2 3 66.7

Fadeaway Bank shot 2 2 100
Floating Jump shot 7 11 63.6
Jump Bank Shot 4 8 50.0
Jump Shot 13 63 20.6
Layup Shot 5 16 31.3

Pullup Bank shot 2 4 50.0
Pullup Jump shot 6 14 42.9

Running Finger Roll Layup Shot 0 1 0.0

Running Jump Shot 3 7 42.9
Running Layup Shot 3 7 42.9

Running Pull-Up Jump Shot 1 1 100
Step Back Bank Jump Shot 1 1 100
Step Back Jump shot 3 6 50.0
Turnaround Fadeaway shot 1 1 100
Turnaround Hook Shot 1 1 100
Turnaround Jump Shot 2 3 66.7

Derrick Rose February
Shot Type Detail FGM FGA FG%

Driving Bank shot 1 1 100
Driving Finger Roll Layup Shot 2 3 66.7
Driving Floating Jump Shot 1 1 100
Driving Layup Shot 11 19 57.9
Driving Reverse Layup Shot 1 1 100

Floating Jump shot 9 18 50.0
Fadeaway Bank shot 0 1 0.0
Fadeaway Jump Shot 0 2 0.0

Jump Bank Shot 6 11 54.5
Jump Shot 21 61 34.4
Layup Shot 3 13 23.1

Pullup Bank shot 1 2 50.0
Pullup Jump shot 1 5 20.0

Reverse Layup Shot 1 1 100
Running Jump Shot 1 2 50.0
Running Layup Shot 3 3 100
Running Pull-Up Jump Shot 1 1 100
Step Back Bank Jump Shot 1 2 50.0
Step Back Jump shot 1 2 50.0
Tip Layup Shot 1 1 100
Turnaround Jump Shot 2 2 100

Derrick Rose March
Shot Type Detail FGM FGA FG%

Driving Bank shot 2 2 100
Driving Finger Roll Layup Shot 4 6 66.7
Driving Floating Bank Jump Shot 1 2 50.0
Driving Floating Jump Shot 5 10 50.0
Driving Hook Shot 1 1 100
Driving Layup Shot 20 41 48.8
Driving Reverse Layup Shot 5 8 62.5
Dunk Shot 1 1 100
Fadeaway Bank shot 1 1 100
Fadeaway Jump Shot 3 3 100
Floating Jump shot 7 10 70.0

Jump Bank Shot 1 2 50.0
Jump Shot 30 86 34.9
Layup Shot 1 13 7.7
Pullup Bank shot 1 3 33.3

Pullup Jump shot 10 19 52.6

Reverse Layup Shot 2 3 66.7
Running Jump Shot 2 4 50.0
Running Layup Shot 4 4 100
Running Reverse Layup Shot 0 1 0.0
Step Back Jump shot 5 7 71.4

He shot under 50% at the rim in February and March. Average is 60%, elite is 70%. Under 50% is awful.

Here, http://stats.nba.com/league/player/#!/shooting/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&DistanceRange=By%20Zone&sort=Restricted%20Area%20FG%20PCT&dir=1&PlayerPosition=G&SeasonSegment=Post%20All-Star, post-AllStar break he's ranked 167th amongs guards it FG% in the restricted area in that timeframe.


Yes he shot 48% at the rim but that is only one aspect of his game close to the rim. There's also scoring in the paint outside the Restricted area.

Rose is one of the Top guards in the league at getting to the rim! He's also one of the most efficient in the Paint outside the Restricted Area.

After the All Star Break
Restricted Area In The Paint (Non-RA)
Player TEAM AGE FGM FGA FG% FGM FGA FG%
Isaiah Thomas BOS 27 4.1 7.4 55.8 1.0 2.9 33.8
James Harden HOU 26 4.2 6.4 64.9 1.2 3.0 39.0
Russ Westbrook OKC 27 3.6 6.2 58.1 1.0 2.5 37.9
Tony Allen MEM 34 3.9 6.2 62.5 0.3 1.4 19.2
Stephen Curry GSW 28 3.7 5.6 65.6 0.6 1.1 48.5
Dwyane Wade MIA 34 3.5 5.4 65.1 1.4 3.8 35.9
John Wall WAS 25 2.9 5.4 53.2 0.3 0.9 39.1
Jeff Teague ATL 28 2.9 5.3 55.6 0.7 1.6 45.2
Goran Dragic MIA 30 3.6 5.3 67.8 1.1 2.8 38.5
Andrew Wiggins MIN 21 3.6 5.3 67.6 1.1 2.3 50.8
Damian Lillard POR 25 3.0 5.2 57.5 0.6 2.3 28.1
L. Stephenson MEM 25 3.2 5.2 62.2 0.6 2.1 29.6
Jrue Holiday NOP 26 2.9 5.2 56.4 1.1 2.8 39.2
Derrick Rose CHI 27 2.4 5.0 48.6 1.3 2.5 52.8

These are the top Penetrators for 2015-16

Entire Season          Restricted      In The Paint 
Area Non-RA) Mid-Range Lft Corner 3 Rght Corner 3 Above the Break 3
Player TEAM AGE FGM FGA FG% FGM FGA FG% FGM FGA FG% FGM FGA FG% FGM FGA FG% FGM FGA FG%
Russell Westbrook OKC 27 4.2 7.2 57.9 1.0 2.4 40.5 1.8 4.2 42.9 0.1 0.3 29.2 0.1 0.2 30.8 1.1 3.8 29.7
Tyreke Evans NOP 26 3.4 6.9 48.8 0.1 0.6 20.0 0.6 1.7 38.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.3 3.2 41.3
Isaiah Thomas BOS 27 3.4 6.2 55.5 0.8 2.5 33.0 0.9 2.5 36.5 0.3 0.5 56.8 0.1 0.4 38.7 1.6 4.8 33.8
Damian Lillard POR 25 3.0 5.7 51.9 0.6 1.9 29.7 1.6 3.9 42.6 0.1 0.3 34.8 0.1 0.2 42.9 2.9 7.6 37.8
Andrew Wiggins MIN 21 3.6 5.6 64.0 1.2 2.5 47.0 1.9 5.6 34.1 0.1 0.3 47.6 0.0 0.1 22.2 0.6 2.0 28.3
James Harden HOU 26 3.4 5.6 60.7 0.8 2.3 36.7 1.6 3.9 40.5 0.1 0.3 28.6 0.1 0.5 27.9 2.7 7.2 36.8
Derrick Rose CHI 27 2.7 5.5 48.5 1.2 2.8 43.5 2.2 5.3 41.9 0.1 0.2 28.6 0.0 0.1 33.3 0.6 1.9 29.6

I Believe that Rose can improve on these full season numbers. Being fully healthy and in better condition will really help him in this area.

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

6/26/2016  10:45 PM
wWow, he is one of the top penetrators in the league. I guess many on here overlooked that. Oh Wait, they realize that but recognize that he sucks once he gets there.

Hey, but he is very efficient when he is in the paint but is not in the restricted area. Unfortunately that only gets you 1.2 baskets(1.3 after the break, see the improvement!).

Lucky for us he takes a lot of mid range shots to booster his efficiency. smh. No wait he gets to the free throw line. No wait, he has turned into an excellent distributor taking advantage of his attack skills. Oh, I guess he didn't have the shooters around him because McDermont, Dunleavy, and Mirotic doesn't count.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

6/26/2016  10:57 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:wWow, he is one of the top penetrators in the league. I guess many on here overlooked that. Oh Wait, they realize that but recognize that he sucks once he gets there.

Hey, but he is very efficient when he is in the paint but is not in the restricted area. Unfortunately that only gets you 1.2 baskets(1.3 after the break, see the improvement!).

Lucky for us he takes a lot of mid range shots to booster his efficiency. smh. No wait he gets to the free throw line. No wait, he has turned into an excellent distributor taking advantage of his attack skills. Oh, I guess he didn't have the shooters around him because McDermont, Dunleavy, and Mirotic doesn't count.

stop that ISH

Dude shot 40% from 3 in his last month on 17 makes. (disclaimer: please ignore that he is a 30% shooter for his career)

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Derrick Rose Article Noting His Improvement

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy