fishmike wrote:BRIGGS wrote:fishmike wrote:BRIGGS wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:Bazemore shot 2/14 from the field and 1/5 from 3.He did get 9 rebounds, but then again, the Celts shot 32% from the field...lots of chances for rebounds. Also had 4 assists.
One of the reasons I hate this type of thread is that it is inspired by one very good game. Not sure why there are no threads started for a guy who shoots 2/14 in a game, warning the Knicks to stay away from him.
So maybe he's only worth $10M/yr now?
Can't wait for his next good game and the responses from his supporters.
I think there are several guys who like bazemore months ago. I don't think you can watch the game and say bazemore had a bad game he played solid d rebounded moved the ball played hard and they won. We want good players who work hard and play team ball.
Like Jose, Langston and Lance? No.. what we want is more talent. Nobody hates Bazemore. He's fine, especially what the Hawks are paying him. $15mm is a total joke for a player of that caliber. He's not moving the needle. Better to buy a 2nd rounder and keep grooming guys and save the cap space.
fish mike I agree with you interms of keeping the draft coming in absolute biggest problem over the last 15 years is we treated the draft as a conduit for star phucking I'm looking at contracts as I don't want to spend more than 12 mm unless I'm getting star but we have to understand that an 8 mm contract is the mle. So it's the equivilant of a 4-5 mm contract in previous years. 10-12 mm is what Affalo got on the same percentage this year
$8mm still adds up and adds up fast. We just don't need to spend on complimentary role players. We need impact level talent. Like Bazemore, but he's not that caliber talent I am looking for. The Knicks are much better served working with a guy like Early than spending $8mm on Bazemore. If it doesn't work out fine... cap flexibility is very important. We have all our draft picks moving forward. That's the hedge.If the Knicks cant sign a bigtime FA.. really it comes down to Derozan and Batum. If I cant get one of those two I am not spending big money on more guys like AA to balance the roster. I would rather focus on improving from within.
Hey.. if next year is a dud fine. We get a good draft pick. If Melo hasn't bolted than that offseason we have $60mm in cap space and you send Melo and KP to Cali to convince CP3 to play PG and Westbrook to play SG and you have a young talent roster to support Rolo/KP/Melo/Westbrook/CP3
Obviously a dream scenario but its not outlandish to hope that minor upgrades and bigger contributions from KP/Early/Grant move us to .500 and a playoff team. Not a bad place to be with $60mm in cap space for that offseason (Knicks at $50mm after next year with a $110mm projected cap, give or take)
This could be right. Phil may have learned a lot with the AA deal. He was looking for a vet stopgap but in the end those guys can be an expensive tease. The SG spot is HUGE in this system but you can't just stick a guy like AA in there and get what you need. This system works best with GUARDS that are not pure PG or SG but instead are Combo Guards that can do a little of everything. AA did very little besides shoot the ball and that kills this offense. Not to mention you want 2 way guards and AA was horrid on D.
As for your point on internal growth, I agree. Gotta continue to develop Jerian, Gallo and see what you can get from Wroten. Low cost options that could improve enough to make a difference next year along with a maturing KP.
What do you guys think about Lance Stephenson? He might get cut by Memphis this summer. He's struggled since leaving the Pacers but he had a couple of good seasons in Indy when he had a very clear role as a starter. I've been down on him in the past but maybe a structured system is what he needs. He was good in that kind of role in Indy. Just a thought.