Sangfroid wrote:

Nalod wrote:I propose to Martin and Andrew this become a sticky thread so all things Briggs can be in one place!
A good poster as such deserves his own place to post his ideas and videos.

Probably better to leave them as individual threads. That way , they get the attention that they deserve. Clumping them together leads to missed information.

Then maybe they should be in a diff forum? E.g. a draft forum?

Maybe some of us don't want to be inundated with 20 of these a day?

I would actually go into the sticky or a diff forum to read the info (when I want to) but this is starting to looking like my yahoo email inbox.

F500ONE wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

Nalod wrote:

mreinman wrote:that is funny!

I second this motion.

really not trying to be cute here, As F500 said, it consolidates the Brigg'ness in to one easier to read thread.

Ill just post on realgm and leave you wise asses to yourselves.

Was this really necessary

Why wouldn't you want a dedicated thread with your Brand on it

For all of us to track, what's getting in the way of you supporting this

Hell I'd want my own thread.

Sangfroid wrote:

Nalod wrote:I propose to Martin and Andrew this become a sticky thread so all things Briggs can be in one place!
A good poster as such deserves his own place to post his ideas and videos.

Probably better to leave them as individual threads. That way , they get the attention that they deserve. Clumping them together leads to missed information.

Wholeheartedly disagree as you could Google

1 thread and find the specific information desired by using word tags

This isn't the 1900s Froid

And to be quite Frank Briggs isn't getting too many hits

On his individual threads although there would be great value

In 1 Singular thread with his Brand on it

Regarding Karl Anthony Towns, we could discuss him in the knick draft thread.
Or we can start another thread.

BRIGGS wrote:

Hector wrote:IF I was an NBA prospect, I'd love for BRIGGS to come see me on a good night!

Ive primarily said the same thing all year. If you look I picked Russell as pick #2 before anyone else on the Internet and Im the only dude who is saying Tyler Harvey and Christmas are mid first round picks. I found guys very early before even on radar like Upshaw and Zeek Woodley. Go look at my mocks--they tell the tale. Its easy to break them on someone when they try to share content with everyone and they have an opinion--but my opinion has been atleast reasonable. The draft is a fluid process you gather new information all year.

I was just messing with you.
You will be right some how some way because you have named just about every player in the draft!

Good for you though, if The Knicks were smart, they'd hire you to scout.

mreinman wrote:that is funny!

I second this motion.

Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature

BRIGGS wrote:

mreinman wrote:that is funny!

I second this motion.

Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature

why? you should feel honored?

why not have your own thread?

Why take it personally? Be proud!

Why not centralize in one thread as opposed to scattering all over other threads?

Why not have a thread that can revisited again and again and actually have a timeline?

Don't get it. sorry.

F500ONE wrote:

mreinman wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

mreinman wrote:that is funny!

I second this motion.

Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature

why? you should feel honored?

why not have your own thread?

Why take it personally? Be proud!

Why not centralize in one thread as opposed to scattering all over other threads?

Why not have a thread that can revisited again and again and actually have a timeline?

Don't get it. sorry.

I think he wants to it to be more difficult

To catch him in his cunning is my only explanation

As in I guess it could be easier to pinpoint

All of his gaffes by going to one centralized thread

I guess that's what happens, when you try and put

Every single potential prospect inside the top 30

Then constantly juggling the Top 14 and the Top 10 and the Top 5 and the Top 3

yeah ... don't get the hesitation.

BRIGGS wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

mreinman wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

mreinman wrote:that is funny!

I second this motion.

Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature

why? you should feel honored?

why not have your own thread?

Why take it personally? Be proud!

Why not centralize in one thread as opposed to scattering all over other threads?

Why not have a thread that can revisited again and again and actually have a timeline?

Don't get it. sorry.

I think he wants to it to be more difficult

To catch him in his cunning is my only explanation

As in I guess it could be easier to pinpoint

All of his gaffes by going to one centralized thread

I guess that's what happens, when you try and put

Every single potential prospect inside the top 30

Then constantly juggling the Top 14 and the Top 10 and the Top 5 and the Top 3

The mock draft process is fluid throughout the season--its very much like stock--they move up slightly or down slightly each week. My top 1-8 is starting to lock in- many of the mid range guys are there and then who knows about 23-30. The pick is in June. If I say watch this kid Zeek Woodley or Robert Upshaw Tyler harvey--its because I have done this for years--and Im just sharing it with everyone here--I mean this is a basketball thread:). Im sure most people appreciate it--and who cares if there are a couple of obnoxious people--that just life.

Then you should agree to have 1 thread

Especially if you feel you're the Yoda of Draft Talk

You do realize much of what you post in singular threads can be missed

By not being encompassed in 1 thread, using the word fluid is an excuse and an aversion of integrity

Making hundreds-thousands of threads on it, is quite frankly OBNOXIOUS