I second this motion.

mreinman wrote:that is funny!

I second this motion.

really not trying to be cute here, As F500 said, it consolidates the Brigg'ness in to one easier to read thread.

BigDaddyG wrote:

Nalod wrote:

mreinman wrote:that is funny!

I second this motion.

really not trying to be cute here, As F500 said, it consolidates the Brigg'ness in to one easier to read thread.

Are Briggs' draft thoughts on the Alba thread's level? I'm concerned about the precedent this sets.

For example???

BRIGGS wrote:

Nalod wrote:

mreinman wrote:that is funny!

I second this motion.

really not trying to be cute here, As F500 said, it consolidates the Brigg'ness in to one easier to read thread.

Ill just post on realgm and leave you wise asses to yourselves.

If I was not serious, i'd be far more sarcastic and cunning in my request. Actually I just thought it creates follow up converstation about these guys as we look at them.
Better to have fuller convo's than a new thread everytime they on TV?

Nalod wrote:

BigDaddyG wrote:

Nalod wrote:

mreinman wrote:that is funny!

I second this motion.

really not trying to be cute here, As F500 said, it consolidates the Brigg'ness in to one easier to read thread.

Are Briggs' draft thoughts on the Alba thread's level? I'm concerned about the precedent this sets.

For example???

IronWG had some humorous posts. Did he deserve his own thread? I mean, I enjoy the insights Briggs provides, but their not ALBA thread worthy. I think that's the standard a thread should meet before we sticky it and make it official.

Nalod wrote:

BigDaddyG wrote:

Nalod wrote:

BigDaddyG wrote:

Nalod wrote:

mreinman wrote:that is funny!

I second this motion.

really not trying to be cute here, As F500 said, it consolidates the Brigg'ness in to one easier to read thread.

Are Briggs' draft thoughts on the Alba thread's level? I'm concerned about the precedent this sets.

For example???

IronWG had some humorous posts. Did he deserve his own thread? I mean, I enjoy the insights Briggs provides, but their not ALBA thread worthy. I think that's the standard a thread should meet before we sticky it and make it official.

Briggs makes lots of posts and so many in fact I think its a valid subject. Perhaps its his own ego that wants his own subject. He does participate in the "Official Knicks" one I created but insists of having his own thread for each idea that pops up after he watches a player. I thought consolidating into one "Briggs" branded one would not just give one good place to discuss his ideas, but also a thread would have more life if there is constant conversations. To me, if you start 5 a day I think it dilutes itself. Just my opinion.

Bottom line is eyeballs on the site to help the owners here offset costs us drinking bandwith!!! Those Youtube videos don't play for free!!!!

Not to mention if everyone did this how much

The board would be cluttered With Singular Subjective Opinions

The complaints would come by the droves

Nalod actually did him one better by suggesting a branded thread

But of course Briggs isn't an Ultimateknick Team Player

Maybe a tad selfish, wants volume thread posting so he can walk away and say he led the boards

In picking the right talents, just a matter of time before he ask

Martin and Andrew for a no Ban Clause with a 15% kicker if he's traded to RealGM

Nalod wrote:I propose to Martin and Andrew this become a sticky thread so all things Briggs can be in one place!
A good poster as such deserves his own place to post his ideas and videos.

Probably better to leave them as individual threads. That way , they get the attention that they deserve. Clumping them together leads to missed information.