[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Yes There Is A Game Tonight: [Broadway Productions vs Boogie Down Productions]
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 14 of 14 « First‹ Previous 12  13  14 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915
12/28/2014  1:28 AM
Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes
Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
AUTOADVERT
Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862
12/28/2014  1:31 AM
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
TPercy wrote:
mreinman wrote:
TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

[the following message is to be spoken in the idiot Cali brogue used on this SNL skit)]

buh, buh, wah you mean way ta go Ph-ph-ph-illllllllllllllllll?

I thot u wuz gonna wait and seeeeeeeee

how he duz in da off-seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeson brah

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748
12/28/2014  1:32 AM
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
TPercy wrote:
mreinman wrote:
TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

I don't think Phil was in charge when those deals were in place if my memmory serves me correct. they were in febuary or whenever the trade deadline was when Steve Mills was in charge

The Future is Bright!
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
12/28/2014  1:34 AM
TPercy wrote:
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
TPercy wrote:
mreinman wrote:
TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

I don't think Phil was in charge when those deals were in place if my memmory serves me correct. they were in febuary or whenever the trade deadline was when Steve Mills was in charge

it was widely reported that phil was already pulling the strings

so here is what phil is thinking ....
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
12/28/2014  1:35 AM
Splat wrote:
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
TPercy wrote:
mreinman wrote:
TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

[the following message is to be spoken in the idiot Cali brogue used on this SNL skit)]

buh, buh, wah you mean way ta go Ph-ph-ph-illllllllllllllllll?

I thot u wuz gonna wait and seeeeeeeee

how he duz in da off-seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeson brah

are you not in the US?

video not avail in the US

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862
12/28/2014  1:40 AM
mreinman wrote:
Splat wrote:
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
TPercy wrote:
mreinman wrote:
TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

[the following message is to be spoken in the idiot Cali brogue used on this SNL skit)]

buh, buh, wah you mean way ta go Ph-ph-ph-illllllllllllllllll?

I thot u wuz gonna wait and seeeeeeeee

how he duz in da off-seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeson brah

are you not in the US?

video not avail in the US

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/28/2014  2:31 AM
Knicks1969 wrote:Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

Melo wants to pad his numbers for the allstar game
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
12/28/2014  5:27 AM
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
TPercy wrote:
mreinman wrote:
TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil


Yup, pretty obvious Phil wanted to assess the players he had, thus no trades. Thus why no trades even now.
smackeddog
Posts: 38386
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
12/28/2014  5:48 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/28/2014  5:52 AM
Why do people still go on about us not trading Shump for Collinson?! For the last time!!!::

IF WE HAD TRADED FOR COLLINSON, WE WOULD NOT HAVE HAD HIS BIRD RIGHTS (he was on a one year deal with the clips). WE COULD ONLY HAVE OFFERED HIM $3MIL. THE KINGS PAID HIM MORE THAN THAT. THEREFORE WE WOULD HAVE TRADED SHUMP FOR NOTHING- WELL DONE KEYBOARD GM's!!!!!!!

I hope he follows all of your advices in future!
smackeddog
Posts: 38386
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
12/28/2014  5:51 AM
Knicks1969 wrote:Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

Its like watching what D'Antoni did to Kobe! Kobe's minutes prior to the achilles injury were insane (especially for a player his age), something like 47mins, 48mins, 48mins, 46min, 47mins.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
12/28/2014  9:02 AM
Don't the knicks have a Nice 1 year exception.....why isn't Josh Smith a knick???
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/28/2014  10:19 AM
smackeddog wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

Its like watching what D'Antoni did to Kobe! Kobe's minutes prior to the achilles injury were insane (especially for a player his age), something like 47mins, 48mins, 48mins, 46min, 47mins.

That was all KOBE!!! He wasn't listening to MDA at all at that time so MDA let him do what wanted. That's why you saw no reaction from MDA when it happened. I was watching all the games and it was clear Kobe did what he wanted.
F500ONE
Posts: 23899
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5844
12/28/2014  11:52 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/28/2014  12:02 PM
nixluva wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

Its like watching what D'Antoni did to Kobe! Kobe's minutes prior to the achilles injury were insane (especially for a player his age), something like 47mins, 48mins, 48mins, 46min, 47mins.

That was all KOBE!!! He wasn't listening to MDA at all at that time so MDA let him do what wanted. That's why you saw no reaction from MDA when it happened. I was watching all the games and it was clear Kobe did what he wanted.

Yeah because D'Antoni never had a history of running players into the ground

In particular when he knew he was lame duck status


And alienated a presence who could have lessened the burden on Kobe

I watched the Lakers that season and saw quite the contrary
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/28/2014  11:55 AM
nixluva wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

Its like watching what D'Antoni did to Kobe! Kobe's minutes prior to the achilles injury were insane (especially for a player his age), something like 47mins, 48mins, 48mins, 46min, 47mins.

That was all KOBE!!! He wasn't listening to MDA at all at that time so MDA let him do what wanted. That's why you saw no reaction from MDA when it happened. I was watching all the games and it was clear Kobe did what he wanted.

Well he was hurt and had no business going back in. It was horrible to watch. I believe he got hurt two times and still came back until he tore the Achilles. Kobe definitely is strong willed but D'Antoni needed to sit him that game. I am not a Kobe fan but that was one of the saddest sports events I can remember watching.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
12/28/2014  1:16 PM
F500ONE wrote:
mreinman wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
Splat wrote:
F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by Lark

But he's hustling nevertheless

You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time

If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played

Actually I've given credit to 2 players

Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy


But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact

On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team


I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough

To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late

who cares how sac's back court did?

they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.

wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?


Because you have to play both sides of the ball

When players go off for career nights


You can't leverage the other side too much over the other

And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the


"We should have picked up his option"

From Keith Schlosser:

"Shane Larkin arguably had one of the best games of his young career, tallying 14 points and a career-high 4 steals. In addition to serving as a pesky defender throughout, the guard went about his offensive game in an intelligent matter. He attacked the basket, and converted on all six of his free throws."

so here is what phil is thinking ....
F500ONE
Posts: 23899
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5844
12/28/2014  1:22 PM
mreinman wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
mreinman wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
Splat wrote:
F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by Lark

But he's hustling nevertheless

You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time

If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played

Actually I've given credit to 2 players

Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy


But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact

On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team


I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough

To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late

who cares how sac's back court did?

they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.

wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?


Because you have to play both sides of the ball

When players go off for career nights


You can't leverage the other side too much over the other

And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the


"We should have picked up his option"

From Keith Schlosser:

"Shane Larkin arguably had one of the best games of his young career, tallying 14 points and a career-high 4 steals. In addition to serving as a pesky defender throughout, the guard went about his offensive game in an intelligent matter. He attacked the basket, and converted on all six of his free throws."

To each his own, I never said Larkin

Played the whole game bad


He didn't play "GREAT" or "VERY GOOD"

He was solid or let's say held his own


It was arguably one of Collison's better games of the yr

As was McCallum's and Stauskas guys Larkin got cross-matched with
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
12/28/2014  1:38 PM
F500ONE wrote:
mreinman wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
mreinman wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
Splat wrote:
F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by Lark

But he's hustling nevertheless

You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time

If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played

Actually I've given credit to 2 players

Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy


But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact

On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team


I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough

To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late

who cares how sac's back court did?

they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.

wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?


Because you have to play both sides of the ball

When players go off for career nights


You can't leverage the other side too much over the other

And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the


"We should have picked up his option"

From Keith Schlosser:

"Shane Larkin arguably had one of the best games of his young career, tallying 14 points and a career-high 4 steals. In addition to serving as a pesky defender throughout, the guard went about his offensive game in an intelligent matter. He attacked the basket, and converted on all six of his free throws."

To each his own, I never said Larkin

Played the whole game bad


He didn't play "GREAT" or "VERY GOOD"

He was solid or let's say held his own


It was arguably one of Collison's better games of the yr

As was McCallum's and Stauskas guys Larkin got cross-matched with

you can just say "I made an oopsey" its ok

you are asking the same from Nix, right?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451
12/28/2014  1:53 PM
Larkin and aldrich were my two mvps from last night. Melo also had a good game
Page 14 of 14 « First‹ Previous 12  13  14 
« Reply To Topic
Yes There Is A Game Tonight: [Broadway Productions vs Boogie Down Productions]
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy