[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Cole Aldrich give me his numbers if he plays 32 minutes a night
Author Thread
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

8/28/2014  8:48 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/28/2014  8:55 AM
Not sure of exact numbers but at 28 mins per, this guy will have a HUGE impact defensively & on the boards. You can take that to the bank. I've seen enough to call that FACT. Plus he'll clean up any garbage around the rim. Glad we brought him back but still can't wrap my head around the fact that we only inked him for the 1 additional year. How the hell do you not give this guy a 2 or 3 year deal or at least 1 + a team option?? That's gonna come back to bite us -- instead of taking a chance on a team friendly amount for multiple years, when he produces now we're looking at chewing up even more cap. Hey whatever -- if he produces what some of you are saying (he's capable man), I'll wanna see him get paid.
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/28/2014  9:15 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/28/2014  9:16 AM
9 points, 11 rbs, 2 blocks at 36 mpg - close to but slightly below his career per 36. That would be my guess. If it's 32 min, maybe 8 and 10. His whole NBA sample of playing time is small though.
VDesai
Posts: 36949
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
8/28/2014  9:33 AM
He'll probably max out around 26 mins and be at about 6 pts, 8 rebs, 1.5 blk
GustavBahler
Posts: 41138
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

8/28/2014  9:47 AM
5pts and 6 rebounds
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

8/28/2014  9:56 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/28/2014  9:57 AM
So based on some of these projections what do you guys think we might be looking at as far as bringing Cole back next summer? Throw out some numbers. Say they don't suppress him, they play him close to 30 a night and he goes close to 10/10 and 2. What's that worth to start off a new contract? $5mm -- over or under? Just trying to get a feel for how much cap he might chewy up next off-season.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

8/28/2014  9:56 AM
Finestrg wrote:Not sure of exact numbers but at 28 mins per, this guy will have a HUGE impact defensively & on the boards. You can take that to the bank. I've seen enough to call that FACT. Plus he'll clean up any garbage around the rim. Glad we brought him back but still can't wrap my head around the fact that we only inked him for the 1 additional year. How the hell do you not give this guy a 2 or 3 year deal or at least 1 + a team option?? That's gonna come back to bite us -- instead of taking a chance on a team friendly amount for multiple years, when he produces now we're looking at chewing up even more cap. Hey whatever -- if he produces what some of you are saying (he's capable man), I'll wanna see him get paid.


Were you not claiming facts about Jeremy Tyler?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
8/28/2014  10:00 AM
aldrich always looked better out there than tyler. shocking how so many thought the opposite.
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
8/28/2014  10:00 AM
Much better and more consistent numbers than Mozgov. He is our new Center project.

David Lee lite? David Lee wouldn't get a block playing pickup against most of you dweebs.

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

8/28/2014  10:02 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/28/2014  10:42 AM
mreinman wrote:
Finestrg wrote:Not sure of exact numbers but at 28 mins per, this guy will have a HUGE impact defensively & on the boards. You can take that to the bank. I've seen enough to call that FACT. Plus he'll clean up any garbage around the rim. Glad we brought him back but still can't wrap my head around the fact that we only inked him for the 1 additional year. How the hell do you not give this guy a 2 or 3 year deal or at least 1 + a team option?? That's gonna come back to bite us -- instead of taking a chance on a team friendly amount for multiple years, when he produces now we're looking at chewing up even more cap. Hey whatever -- if he produces what some of you are saying (he's capable man), I'll wanna see him get paid.


Were you not claiming facts about Jeremy Tyler?

No. I was one of the first/only ones on here who was ready to scrap the whole Tyler experiment last year after seeing him in action a few times.. Originally I got excited when we first got him, using his DL highlight vid as a reference. There's no denying he shows excellent potential in that video. I really thought we had something with him after watching that clip. It brought back memories of Vin Baker in his prime for me. Then reality set in... Fact of the matter is that Jeremy Tyler is not a big-time prospect, not a guy that will produce anywhere near what Cole Aldrich can do on the pro level given the same amount of PT. FACT. That became clear as day. Apples and oranges..

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

8/28/2014  10:03 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/28/2014  10:16 AM
dk7th wrote:aldrich always looked better out there than tyler. shocking how so many thought the opposite.

Exactly. Completely agree. And I said as much last year as the season unfolded and we saw more and more of each player. I even thought we should've invested more time in Earl Clark over Tyler after a while.

Cole Aldrich give me his numbers if he plays 32 minutes a night

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy