Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
4/24/2014 12:08 PM LAST EDITED: 4/24/2014 12:10 PM
And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:
http://www.boxscoregeeks.com/teams Clearly it had some teams off and didn't do as was as the win shares approach overall though. I'll try to find more but that's so far Schoene: 37 Win shares: 43 Wins produced: 35 Most fans here: 45 to 60 Actual: 37 |
fishmike
Posts: 53117 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
4/24/2014 12:12 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:Yup... they had the Nuggs winning more games then the Pacers (39). Your honestly posting this? My god talk about zero value dude. Garbage "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
4/24/2014 12:27 PM LAST EDITED: 4/24/2014 12:31 PM
fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:Yup... they had the Nuggs winning more games then the Pacers (39). Your honestly posting this? My god talk about zero value dude. Garbage Yeah, wins produced was better than most observers but worse than most metrics. It's nowhere near the garbage predictions from here (including my 47 win trash prediction). I was just being thorough. I don't give WP much weight. With Indiana, they were off by about as much as fans here were with the Knicks after all. Given how hard doing just one team was, imagine if fans here had to make 30 predictions! Even though I'm harsh on WP, with the Nuggets, I'm sure they were working on the statement that Gallo would be returning before the all-star break. That probably was a 3 to 4 win difference. |
dk7th
Posts: 30006 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/14/2012 Member: #4228 USA |
4/24/2014 1:46 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:Yup... they had the Nuggs winning more games then the Pacers (39). Your honestly posting this? My god talk about zero value dude. Garbage not that YOU need to be reminded but i fancy this post of mine.... http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=45159&page=2 knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
|
fishmike
Posts: 53117 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
4/24/2014 1:46 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:do metrics show the impact when your 2nd best player a year ago starts suspended and shoots like 30% for two months? Do they show take into account that two of your starers would miss big chunks of the season? Did metrics predict Felton and Shump, two guards that we needed good play from would have career low years and fail to scratch 40% shooting?fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:Yup... they had the Nuggs winning more games then the Pacers (39). Your honestly posting this? My god talk about zero value dude. Garbage I mean you have yet to show me anything scientific that has any accuracy. You picked 47 wins because the Knicks won 54 the year before and their core was intact. I picked 50 wins for the same reason. Sorry, you cant tout a system that picks the Pacers to win 39 games when most everyone with eyes picked them to fight the Heat for the top spot. Its silly. You put too much into these #s and not enough into traditional stats. PPG, REBs, Ast, Stls, TOs, FG% and Wins and losses still trump all man. Sorry... they just do "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
4/24/2014 1:50 PM
fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:do metrics show the impact when your 2nd best player a year ago starts suspended and shoots like 30% for two months? Do they show take into account that two of your starers would miss big chunks of the season? Did metrics predict Felton and Shump, two guards that we needed good play from would have career low years and fail to scratch 40% shooting?fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:Yup... they had the Nuggs winning more games then the Pacers (39). Your honestly posting this? My god talk about zero value dude. Garbage I think that metrics did not have a hard time predicting that JR, Bargs, Felton and Shump would be extremely inefficient and that Amare would close to useless. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
tkf
Posts: 36487 Alba Posts: 6 Joined: 8/13/2001 Member: #87 |
4/24/2014 2:38 PM
dk7th wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:Yup... they had the Nuggs winning more games then the Pacers (39). Your honestly posting this? My god talk about zero value dude. Garbage haha, you and 3g4g called it right on the money, and of course i cosigned the post as i agreed 100% Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF
|
fishmike
Posts: 53117 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
4/24/2014 2:51 PM
tkf wrote:I didnt open the link... is it a photo collage of you three wanking each other?dk7th wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:Yup... they had the Nuggs winning more games then the Pacers (39). Your honestly posting this? My god talk about zero value dude. Garbage "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38386 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
4/24/2014 3:40 PM
Ha, 8% wanted to keep Bargs, and 5% wanted to keep Felton! I wonder what their reasoning was!
|
dk7th
Posts: 30006 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/14/2012 Member: #4228 USA |
4/24/2014 3:43 PM
tkf wrote:dk7th wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:Yup... they had the Nuggs winning more games then the Pacers (39). Your honestly posting this? My god talk about zero value dude. Garbage what happened to 3g4g anyway? he figured there's no use in posting since he knew the season would be an epic fail? good for him if so. knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
4/24/2014 3:52 PM
tkf wrote:dk7th wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:Yup... they had the Nuggs winning more games then the Pacers (39). Your honestly posting this? My god talk about zero value dude. Garbage too funny. 3g was a smart guy as is dk. You cosigning is just a comical stamp of humor. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
4/24/2014 3:53 PM
dk7th wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:And wins produced, which had the Knicks at 35 wins this year:Yup... they had the Nuggs winning more games then the Pacers (39). Your honestly posting this? My god talk about zero value dude. Garbage Good call. The only issue is that you did not state the correct reasons for implosions. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|