Author | Thread |
NYKBocker
Posts: 37951 Alba Posts: 474 Joined: 1/14/2003 Member: #377 USA |
4/24/2014 1:22 PM
holfresh wrote:fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Lin at $8mio would be a lot more valuable to the Knicks than the rockets. There was already a comfort level here. Unfortunately we were too busy "woo'ing" 40yr old Steve Nash Asik and Lin is not the price here. It would be Parsons and picks. Asik and Lin contract is needed to make the trade work. It would really be a no brainer for us if Melo has to go. We get 2 expiring contracts along with Parsons and picks. What is not to like? |
AUTOADVERT |
fishmike
Posts: 53134 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
4/24/2014 1:23 PM
holfresh wrote:hey.. I would say Lin/Parsons/Asik + 2 picks for Melo and Bargs and leave it at that. Being said I dont think even that could happen because Hou is over the luxury threashold so I thought they couldnt sign and trade?fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Lin at $8mio would be a lot more valuable to the Knicks than the rockets. There was already a comfort level here. Unfortunately we were too busy "woo'ing" 40yr old Steve Nash "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
NYKBocker
Posts: 37951 Alba Posts: 474 Joined: 1/14/2003 Member: #377 USA |
4/24/2014 1:26 PM LAST EDITED: 4/24/2014 1:28 PM
fishmike wrote:holfresh wrote:hey.. I would say Lin/Parsons/Asik + 2 picks for Melo and Bargs and leave it at that. Being said I dont think even that could happen because Hou is over the luxury threashold so I thought they couldnt sign and trade?fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Lin at $8mio would be a lot more valuable to the Knicks than the rockets. There was already a comfort level here. Unfortunately we were too busy "woo'ing" 40yr old Steve Nash as long aas you get the same money back then you can do a trade. EDIT: Melo for Asik, Lin, Parson, Montijunas and picks works. |
fishmike
Posts: 53134 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
4/24/2014 1:27 PM
NYKBocker wrote:yup... you beat me by a minuteholfresh wrote:fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Lin at $8mio would be a lot more valuable to the Knicks than the rockets. There was already a comfort level here. Unfortunately we were too busy "woo'ing" 40yr old Steve Nash "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
fishmike
Posts: 53134 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
4/24/2014 1:29 PM
NYKBocker wrote:I would do that deal. Kills any chance of cap space FA because you have to pay guys. Assuming you want to keep Shump, Parsons, Lin, Asik and all will need to be paid.fishmike wrote:holfresh wrote:hey.. I would say Lin/Parsons/Asik + 2 picks for Melo and Bargs and leave it at that. Being said I dont think even that could happen because Hou is over the luxury threashold so I thought they couldnt sign and trade?fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Lin at $8mio would be a lot more valuable to the Knicks than the rockets. There was already a comfort level here. Unfortunately we were too busy "woo'ing" 40yr old Steve Nash However we have seen its poor choice to pay role players when you dont have a star. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
4/24/2014 1:43 PM
fishmike wrote:NYKBocker wrote:I would do that deal. Kills any chance of cap space FA because you have to pay guys. Assuming you want to keep Shump, Parsons, Lin, Asik and all will need to be paid.fishmike wrote:holfresh wrote:hey.. I would say Lin/Parsons/Asik + 2 picks for Melo and Bargs and leave it at that. Being said I dont think even that could happen because Hou is over the luxury threashold so I thought they couldnt sign and trade?fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Lin at $8mio would be a lot more valuable to the Knicks than the rockets. There was already a comfort level here. Unfortunately we were too busy "woo'ing" 40yr old Steve Nash But this would allow us flexibility in 2015-16. Don't see why fans are not willing to let this coming season go. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
4/24/2014 1:49 PM LAST EDITED: 4/24/2014 1:50 PM
mreinman wrote:fishmike wrote:NYKBocker wrote:I would do that deal. Kills any chance of cap space FA because you have to pay guys. Assuming you want to keep Shump, Parsons, Lin, Asik and all will need to be paid.fishmike wrote:holfresh wrote:hey.. I would say Lin/Parsons/Asik + 2 picks for Melo and Bargs and leave it at that. Being said I dont think even that could happen because Hou is over the luxury threashold so I thought they couldnt sign and trade?fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Lin at $8mio would be a lot more valuable to the Knicks than the rockets. There was already a comfort level here. Unfortunately we were too busy "woo'ing" 40yr old Steve Nash Me either. It's like they rather get tied up with bad contracts for another 5yrs again the sacrifice 1yr for years of sustainable contending |
fishmike
Posts: 53134 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
4/24/2014 2:35 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Guns... Can you elaborate on that? You mention that alot, along with the draft. Is your proposal tank for one year and take a shot at a franchise player then build around that guy? Lay it out there... because I hear alot of lets pass on resigning a HOF player still in his prime for this mystical magical lets contend for a decade scenario, but I dont see the blue print.mreinman wrote:fishmike wrote:NYKBocker wrote:I would do that deal. Kills any chance of cap space FA because you have to pay guys. Assuming you want to keep Shump, Parsons, Lin, Asik and all will need to be paid.fishmike wrote:holfresh wrote:hey.. I would say Lin/Parsons/Asik + 2 picks for Melo and Bargs and leave it at that. Being said I dont think even that could happen because Hou is over the luxury threashold so I thought they couldnt sign and trade?fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Lin at $8mio would be a lot more valuable to the Knicks than the rockets. There was already a comfort level here. Unfortunately we were too busy "woo'ing" 40yr old Steve Nash Who wouldnt love that? We all want that... but is it a pipedream? "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
4/24/2014 2:49 PM
fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Guns... Can you elaborate on that? You mention that alot, along with the draft. Is your proposal tank for one year and take a shot at a franchise player then build around that guy? Lay it out there... because I hear alot of lets pass on resigning a HOF player still in his prime for this mystical magical lets contend for a decade scenario, but I dont see the blue print.mreinman wrote:fishmike wrote:NYKBocker wrote:I would do that deal. Kills any chance of cap space FA because you have to pay guys. Assuming you want to keep Shump, Parsons, Lin, Asik and all will need to be paid.fishmike wrote:holfresh wrote:hey.. I would say Lin/Parsons/Asik + 2 picks for Melo and Bargs and leave it at that. Being said I dont think even that could happen because Hou is over the luxury threashold so I thought they couldnt sign and trade?fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Lin at $8mio would be a lot more valuable to the Knicks than the rockets. There was already a comfort level here. Unfortunately we were too busy "woo'ing" 40yr old Steve Nash Yes as I've been saying for years I rather do that the. Keep doing what the Knicks have been doing the past 15yrs |