CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:gunsnewing wrote:TeamBall wrote:dk7th wrote:you don't close out on 3s against a team on its home floor you are going to be in big trouble. they shot 55% from there.it wasn't just wall blowing past everyone but okafor as well.
no defensive intensity = this team is unprofessional.
you don't move the ball around and share the shot selection with novak, chandler and kidd you will get acquire 14 assists, with felton getting 4 assists.
stoudemire had some nice moves and melo had a couple of good feeds. this two-man game needs to be cultivated.
I wouldnt go so far as to say unprofessional but its pretty bad how they sometimes decide they dont need to play defense against certain teams.
yep. Felton's comments about turning it on and off pretty much confirms this major flaw this team has
we need to be a top 2 seed and losing these sorts of games does not inspire confidence. it's not THAT you lose but HOW you lose.
19 out of our last 34 games are on the road
15 out of our last 34 games are against the top 8 teams in the league
8 B2B make up 16 of those 34 games
4 B2B of those 8 B2B are on the road
the defense has to get better or we may not get the seeding we need to advance in the playoffs.
the knicks could get it together and get 55 wins but then they could also continue to play lackluster defense and only garner 48 wins.
again i have to wonder where the focus, re-commitment, and leadership will come from within this group?
When this seven game stretch started you said it would be character defining for this team. The Knicks have gone 5-1 since you said that. This was a bad loss but I have a hard time with you popping in at the end of a five game winning streak to start harping on the negative. This the first game that fits your agenda. Did you get kicked off of realgm or did you just decide that the fans here were passionate enough to react to your constant negativity?
can you point out where i am being negative? i said their defense does not inspire confidence and i agree with the majority here that it hasn't for quite some time now.
they just don't look hungry.
again, it's not THAT you win or lose it's HOW you win or lose that matters. they didn't go 5-1 by throttling inferior opponents defensively, and they aren't reflecting their coach's values. as a real knick fan that is troubling to me and it should be troubling to you to.
I thought tonight's game sucked. I hate when the team comes out and plays like they did tonight. However, the season is 82 games, it's a grind. But I do have a very hard time with most of your posts as I believe you have an agenda. So I really would like to know, did you get kicked off realgm?
yes i have been banned from there. the final straw was not my take on the team, which you find so irritating, so much as insulting moocow, a "global mod." you see, i found him to be a clueless bully. not a fan of people throwing their weight around who are incapable of civil discourse. eventually i said he must really enjoy gargling melo's balls. that was pretty much it. also kane2021, a forum mod, came across as a cellblock kingpin, but is little more than a dunce. i don't know why these people are allowed to remain in their positions without peer review. it leads to groupthink.
people who prefer being surrounded by like-minded people never learning anything and only experience the edification of having their opinions confirmed.
no agenda: i participated there with the expectation of learning something because i am, first and foremost, a student of the game... who happens to be a knick fan. to be fair i did learn a few useful things there from a handful of posters-- tkf being among them-- and have been learning a few useful things here too.
are we here to simply shout out our positions to each other or try and learn from each other?
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%